• Wander@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hooray! Younger generations will finally be able to experience the joy of dropping their phone and having to pick up three to four different pieces! /s

    (I’m all for this change, by the way)

  • Doctor MoodMood@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Finally! Now to also force phonemakers to universally provide bootloader unlocks so we can put our own ROMs on our devices once the software support ends.

  • xtract@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    It might lead to thicker phones, but battery and/or SW obsolescence are the main reasons I have been swapping phone in the last 10 years.

    • Reygle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Back in the day when I had a Samsung S4, I bought this massive brick of a battery/new back plate and I LOVED it. Absolutely worth being a bit thick.

  • Graphine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly, with Apple making it incredibly fucking hard to take out their batteries with excessive amounts of glue, I’m okay with this.

      • Graphine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        They do, but they’re incredibly prone to breaking when you pull and sometimes they’re just hard as shit to grip so you have to use a screwdriver to twist and pull.

        I don’t think I need to explain why that’s so dangerous.

        • JCreazy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          As someone who has changed hundreds of iphone batteries, the adhesive sucks. At least they changed to a different adhesive around iphone 8 because alcohol does wonders on it. I don’t even attempt to pull the tabs on those anymore.

          • Graphine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            May I ask how you do that? Do you just…douse the battery in alcohol? There isn’t much of a gap between the adhesive and the battery in my experience, so it just sits inside the chasis and rolls around. I haven’t had any luck with that but I’m probably doing it wrong.

            • JCreazy@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I drizzle some in the corner and then use a sturdy tool to gently pry up on the battery to allow the alcohol to get deeper under. Since the adhesive patches are small to fit around the wireless charging coil, it doesn’t take much. Once you get one side of the battery loose the other will easily come with it, especially if the alcohol got to them.

  • got2best@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Do y’all remember the days when you dropped your phone and it exploded into 3 or 4 pieces? 🤣 Those were the good days.

    • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Three. Battery, cover and the rest. Weirdly, no damage to the plastic display. How? I guess it was the weather bezel

      • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        And when you scratched up the back you bought a new one for $12. No $200 glass or machined aluminum cases that we put $35 covers on just to protect them from every day use.

  • guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Excellent! Batteries in modern phones are surprisingly definitely removable and replaceable. I’ve done it multiple times. However, the unfriendly barrier to entry is glue and clips that require careful prying with spugers. It’s quite clear manufacturers are happy blocking you getting in; plenty people just buy new phones when the battery gets too old.

  • connelhooley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Although this is obviously a step in the right direction it needs to be followed up with security updates, no point increasing the life of the hardware without doing the same for the software.

      • Aras@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I hope you mean, always make it possible to unlock the bootloader offline (to not be dependent on them). There are good security reasons to have it locked by default.

        • Emerald_Earth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yes. No more of that unlock code nonsense. Even Fairphone has an online bootloader unlocking process. I hate it.

    • PlutoParty@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      While it is certainly nice to have continued support, I think I’d disagree that forcing companies to maintain software on legacy/outdated hardware is something that should be legislated. I think that would greatly stifle innovation in a lot of cases.

      I’d be a supporter of something like @Emerald_Earth@lemmy.world’s suggestion, though. If they are no longer able to support security updates, then they should open it up to be able to maintain it yourself/community-maintainable. Expecting a company to maintain support through continued development on a 10 or 20 year old device that in some cases may not even be physically able to handle the updates is a big ask.

      • testsnake@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        At a minimum, stuff should be put in place to allow for people to update legacy hardware to be maintained by individuals.

  • quortez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fingers crossed that this will be implemented well, im tired of having sleek electronics be irrelevant in 2 years when the silicon could go for 5 or six

    • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The silicon could go on for decades if both the modem and processor were fully documented hardware that the community can access and support in the Linux kernel.

      I can run a secure and current form of Linux on 30+ year old hardware if I want to, because the hardware documentation was expected by everyone at the time even if some end users were oblivious to what this meant. The whole reason google pushes Android is because they provide a base Linux kernel that hardware manufacturers can easily slip their proprietary junk into without requiring them to add the kind of open source code needed for mainline kernel support by the community. This is the mechanism that depreciates your device. It is totally artificial and an end user exploitation by design.

      • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s usually not silicon on the PCB that fails, but the other electronic components (usually the capacitors) that fails first, and since they are surface mounted devices it’s really difficult to solder them by hand.

        • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          There are no electrolytics in phones, and most newer phones don’t even have tantalums. So long as there are no flexing stresses induced, which is nearly impossible with the way phones are constructed now, the all MLC capacitors construction has the potential to outlast any PC motherboard or laptop by a large margin.

          The most critical issue is board connectors and moisture ingress. The USB-C connector or any other high pin density micro sized connector with a tiny pin pitch, and large electrical potential will fail from charge cycling and a resistance forming between pins. USB-C is particularly bad because reversing the connector doubles the number of pins on the board in a ridiculous amount of space. Just using a standard USB-C connector when ordering a prototype to be fabed at any common board house will double the price. The USB-C pin pitch is too tight for the most common fab process resolution.

          • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            The pin pitch only matters for high power application to prevent arcing, and that can also be resolved through the most modern USB-PD standard (See: USB-PD Extended Power Range, which can support up to 240w), and the electrical adjustment you have to make are all on the device side.

            I don’t know about the resistance forming between the pins, for low cycle applications the cheapest gold flash plating would easily last 10K plug cycles, and accounting for corrosion from hand sweat/oil/hand lotion, many companies favor going for thicker hard gold or platinum plating nowadays. (Rhodium is the absolute best, but it’s just too expensive now to do at scale because they are used in catalytic converters for electric cars). USB-C lasts for many more cycles than the Micro-USB standards before it (You can read the 4 axis and wrenching test standards for mechanical testing on the USB spec) so I’m not sure what you are talking about here.

            • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Lab tests rarely reflect the real world. I’ve seen several issues with Pixels that had an issue with PD failing due to moisture, corrosion, and a bridge developing at the connector.

              • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                Actually, no, the lab tests are standard with all products of all large companies, and they are usually conducted in extreme conditions, like 100% moisture at 80-90C oven for 48 hours and highly concentrated salt spray kind of extreme.

                You bring up the example of Google Pixel, yeah, because it’s Google, they are software people who think they can just cheap out on hardware and save a couple of cents by making it up in software. Look at the Nexus 5X and 6P, both devices had an absurd amount of quality control issues compared to the other products made by the manufacturers, and the only factor in common between them is Google.

                • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Things change with time. The Pixel is now the most secure phone available due to its hardware encryption key verification system. It is the only phone that can run a verifiably secure bootloader and ROM on top of the same untrusted hardware situation found in all modern proprietary devices. Running a Pixel on Graphene OS is the most free and honestly liberating experience that has been available since the invention of capacitive touch technology made these handheld computers popular. The hardware build is on par with any similar device of the same price point, made in the same facilities as most devices.

  • NightOwl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Phones are getting more expensive so people are holding on to them longer, so it’s a nice quality of life improvement to remove the barriers to battery replacement so less people have to go down to a phone repair store to get it changed. The more of a hassle battery replacement is seen the more likely people are to just upgrade and create e-waste.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      The problem here is that in order for most people to be able to replace the battery themselves safely they need to be really idiot proof. We’d need to return to back covers with latches or big screws and batteries in cases and contacts. This shit is bulky, heavy and hardly waterproof.

      New iPhones use lipo pouch with a ZIF connector straight to the motherboard with a “pull to release” adhesive strip hidden under a panel with a single use sticky seal and two small screws. There is no black magic in replacing the battery yourself and the solution is small, lightweight and waterproof. However most people wouldn’t even know which way to turn the screws to loosen them and probably wouldn’t be bothered by throwing the phone away and getting the one with a better camera AI and more emojis.

      • Nogami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        [edit: deleted, echo chamber here. Android good, Apple bad. Moving on and blocking this community, can’t have a reasonable conversation, just like reddit I guess].

        • jorge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The difference is that most of the people isn’t expected to own a mechanical watch, but having a smartphone is pretty much expected. You cannot treat a basic commodity as if it were a luxury item.

  • BanggerRang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    About bloody time! Devices these days are so far technically advanced, no need to upgrade every 2 years. I can hold onto a phone for easily 3-5 years. Especially with hot swap batteries!

  • hyorvenn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Fairphone 3 user here. My main reason to choose this phone a few years ago was because the battery could easily be replaced. Too many phones are perfectly functional but the battery is half dead. Another boon of non-glued batteries : You can carry two (or more) batteries to easily switch when the first one is KO. Meaning no need for portable charger and useless cables in your pocket. Phone at 10% ? Just change it, bam 100% in a second. Easy as that.

    I’ll probably not be the target of such regulations because I wouldn’t choose an anti-consumer phone brand anyway, but at least it’s going in the right direction.

  • M-Reimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    And now they just have to force manufacturers to either at least security patch devices for, let’s say 10 years, or force them to open source everything the community needs to continue supporting this device. It never happened to me that the battery died before support ended.

    Just had that issue with my Pixel 3a XL. No more security updates. Had to replace it with a Pixel 6a but I liked the 3a XL more. It there was any community support for the 3a XL, I would rather sell my 6a again.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      As an Apple user, I definitely have batteries die before the product stops being useful. The company provides feature updates for old phones for several years, and when that runs out they continue to provide security patches for several more years.

      A new iPhone battery is only $47 (if you do the repair yourself, and if you send your old battery back to Apple for a recycling credit), but it’s a pretty complex and arduous process with a fair chance of damaging your phone while attempting it. You also have to pay a deposit, over a thousand dollars, to rent the tools off Apple. Ouch.

      You can take it to an Apple store, but that takes even longer than doing the repair yourself. And it costs more (though you don’t have to pay the outrageous deposit for the tools).

      This legislation would force Apple to make it a simple process with no tools. Yes please.