• snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The son of YOUR president took a single bribe and showed his ding dong on the internet, my president rapes women, lies about his finances, commits fraud and incites an insurrection! See both side are bad!”

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it interesting that the hamas Israel conflict has become such a political issue. Support of Israel in general, yeah religiously charged. But Hamas did start the attack and do a ton of fucked up stuff. SO many hostages including Americans. Israel is an oppressive government and from a distance seems systemically racist not just overly defensive. I just feel like this is a more nuanced issue

        • RedditRefugee69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just think it’s worth noting that Hamas does call for the destruction of Israel. You can’t discount one set of lost lives for another. The only real victims here are non-Hamas Palestinians

    • 𝔇𝔦𝔬@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hunter has done a lot more worse than that. Nice on you picking and choosing his weakness offences.

      • desconectado@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t matter though, he’s not the president and is not involved in any politicalmatters. Sure, he should be investigated if he did something wrong, but why is that relevant?

      • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hunter isn’t even in a political office! He shouldn’t even be on anyone’s radar. And you sir/madam are part of the problem.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good is relative. And relatively speaking, one is definitely good compared to the other.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not good of its own merit though, it’s only good compared to something worse. Neither party represents the interests of the average working class individual.

        • PunnyName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Literally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”.

          “Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.

          • WallEx@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe for you that’s the case, I definitely have a definition of morally good and both sides aren’t that. Accepting collateral for example. You can’t be good in my book if you’re doing that, and they both did.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Both sides ARE bad. The trick is to use critical thinking and realize that one side is “stupid and misguided” bad and the other is “literal nazi, genocide against minorities, and also very stupid” bad.

  • oldbaldgrumpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t we start a ‘We all suck’ movement. There are shitty people of all races, genders, ethnicities, religions, or whatever. Once we all embrace that we can all evolve and work against them.