• Sordid@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has the same vibe as a billionaire with all of his money hidden if tax havens saying that he’d love to contribute more to society, if only the government would tax him more.

    • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      slightly off, it’s saying if government tax other higher networth billionaires more.

  • “If it was up to me I would love to get rid of the entire exclusives on consoles, but that’s not for me to define especially as a low-share player in the console market. The dominant player there [Sony] has defined market competition using exclusives, so that’s the world we live in. I have no love for that world.”

    I’m not sure I believe him on that. Exclusives on console have been a thing pretty much the entire time. Him trying to blame on that Sony is a little weird considering that.

  • t0fr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are Sony and Microsoft just trying to shift the blame back and forth between themselves lately?

      • ram@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        tbh though Nintendo would be fine without exclusive 3rd party games a la MHRise. Just 1st party and second party games a la Bayonetta 2/3 wouldn’t shift the tides all that much.

  • Pliny@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol says the guy who’s buying entire developers and publishers and then making their games exclusive to his platform (starfield) what a load of shit. This whole tit for tat thing between MS and Sony is pathetic.

  • king_dead@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Exclusives have been the console sellers since the industry stopped making pongsoles. Xbox exclusives have never been that great for the most part so i definitely believe him.