“A dream. It’s perfect”: Helium discovery in northern Minnesota may be biggest ever in North America::For a century, the U.S. Government-owned the largest helium reserve in the country, but the biggest exporters now are in Russia, Qatar and Tanzania. With this new discovery, Minnesota could be joining that list.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Thomas Abraham-James, CEO of Pulsar Helium

    Oh my god, fuck this. Have we learned nothing? Nationalize that supply right now.

  • solarvector@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Hopefully we stop wasting this limited resource on fucking balloons.

    Edit: well this kicked off a fun and respectful conversation. The information I can find from actual scientists says wasting helium on balloons is bad. The balloon lobby says it is just a waste byproduct. The balloon lobby brings nothing of value to the world in terms of plastic or helium use, so I’m going to go with the science opinion on this one.

    • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The helium used for balloons is of low purity.

      The shortages you hear about are of pure or near pure helium. The stuff going into the balloons at Tommy’s birthday party isn’t the same thing used to cool superconductors.

      EDIT: And I used to think Reddit was full of ignorant jackasses …

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Balloon helium is 3% helium. So every 33 balloons is one Balloon worth of pure helium. No helium starts off pure. It all gets concentrated/separated to get that way. “Balloon grade” helium can be concentrated just fine and considering that thousands of those balloons are filled every day, it is a lot of wasted helium.

        *I had my percentage swapped, it seems. Balloon helium is 97% helium.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What the fuck are you on about? Helium is an element. Doesn’t matter if it’s low purity it’s wasted and then gone. When the high purity stuff is gone we can’t be like “thank god we can purify the low wall quality stuff” when that’s gone too

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It isn’t exactly wasted. Like you said, it’s an element. Short of any nuclear reactions, it won’t be destroyed (plus I’m not entirely clear if any useful reactions actually consume helium).

          Helium in balloons is returning to the atmosphere. We can re harvest it if we want. While that sounds wasteful, it might actually be more efficient than trying to purify lower grade helium.

          I’ll put it this way. If the helium in balloons could be easily purified to what they need for industrial uses, we wouldn’t be using helium in balloons. Purification industry would drive the price of it sky high.

          EDIT: Ignore most of this, I didn’t do my due research.

          • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            Helium in balloons is returning to the atmosphere. We can re harvest it if we want

            No. It wafts away into space. All the helium we find is a product of radioactive decay- alpha particles- which gets trapped underground. Once it’s released into the atmosphere, it is effectively gone.

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Energy cannot be created nor destroyed; therefore it’s fine if I leave all my lights on 24/7 and use inefficient power hungry bulbs. It’s not a waste if it isn’t destroyed!

            -This guy, apparently

          • Shteou@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I won’t speak to the purification aspect (though I suspect purification is quite trivial), but helium released into the atmosphere is wasted. Saying it’s not destroyed is by the by, we aren’t going to recover it from space as it rapidly escapes the atmosphere.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium

      • Pulptastic@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Using it for balloons is still a waste because that impure helium could be purified for better uses.

        • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, no it could not.

          The stuff used in balloons isn’t pure enough to be used for cryogenic purposes, which is what people really want it for.

          And before you ask purifying it is really difficult.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            No helium found on earth ever, was pure enough for cryo. Not even close. All helium is found in low concentrations and spun extracted to concentrate and start to purify it. Then there are additional filter methods to finish concentrating it. Removing the hydrogen is about the hardest because it’s also abundant and small and light.

            But helium used in balloons can absolutely be concentrated and purified.

            • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              hydrogen is the easy one, because you can burn it off on catalytic bed, then pass through bed of 3A MS to trap water. done

              separating excess oxygen and nitrogen is easier and there’s already some nitrogen (as much as 50%) in crude helium

            • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              yeah it’s distilled off from nitrogen-heavy natural gas, like you could do with nitrogen-heavy gas without helium, or even air. all three processes are done commercially. the issue is that helium bearing natural gas is limited in supply and getting low enough temperature at latter stages of helium refining and liquefying requires bespoke facility. this part is hard

            • sebinspace@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              “Lookie lookie, I got a wiki!”

              -you, probably.

              You guys realize this is the same shit anti vaxxers do? Spend five minutes reading a fucking Wikipedia article and suddenly you’re an expert?

              Christ I hate you people.

                • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  The lemmy community shows itself bare when you start talking about something you have professional experience in. Its hilarious, in a humor in despair type of way. I’ve seen it on stuff im expirenced in and this is not the first time I’ve talked about how the community dissapoints me about it. Skepticism is fine and welcome . . . If you’re able to change your mind when you’re wrong.

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        wdym by “low purity” helium, helium that has been purified cryogenically is easily 99.999% if not better, and this is the main process used worldwide iirc

          • Signtist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t know much about Helium, so I’m a bit confused… What’s to stop us from purifying grade 4 further into 4.7 and beyond besides cost? If the only thing stopping us is cost, then it’s not inaccurate to say that, regardless of grade, the non-renewable element of Helium is being used in frivolous ways because it makes more money to find profitable ways to use the lower-grade helium than to actually further purify and conserve it for more important usage.

            • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              So the cost aspect is absolutely massive. You can theoretically filter elemental gold out of sea water, but it’s not reasonable to do that to supply gold for use in electronics. Similarly you can purify helium as much as you want but at a certain point the cost makes whatever you were doing with it prohibitively expensive.

              Right now we’re still pulling helium out of the ground alongside natural gas deposits. We’re also not doing everything we can to recover, recycle, or substitute the industrial and scientific grade stuff either.

              As less helium gets extracted the cost will go up. This will put market pressure on all users to use it more efficiently or find substitutes wherever possible. If the price goes high enough it might also drive producers to purify helium that might have been sold at a lower grade in the past.

              This find in Minnesota pushes that future scenario down the road a bit, which can either extend the status quo or buy time for technological improvements to be made that will make use and extraction more efficient.

              • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                So we should wait until scarcity is a problem before we even think about acting?

                That’s done humanity very well before. Fortunately for the helium industry our previous inaction will likely leave the planet uninhabitable for most life before the helium scarcity demands action.

          • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Tommy’s dad didn’t steal tank of 6N helium, but it did rolled off the same facility using the same process, main impurity being air (considering it’s a rather minor use, maybe balloon gas is just what is left after cleaning or purging empty helium tanks of higher grade. so it’s maybe not a massive loss. recycling helium within cryogenics and MRI would provide more benefit)

            also wtf is “grade”, 6N means “six nines” means 99.9999%. (americans will use anything but metric units) liquid helium freezes everything else out so it’s 5N without any special extra purification, or at least that’s my impression from looking up spec sheets of helium from facility that i know uses cryogenic purification for it

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Here’s a link to a gas supplier’s website

            Lol…

            Here’s the people lobbying to sell as much as possible because of capitalism!

            Do you link British Petroleum’s website when people talk about how bad climate change is?

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Kid or troll. Hopefully kid. Has to be. There are so many imbeciles on this site it’s hard to tell sometimes though

              • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                My label for that user is, “regularly confidently incorrect”.

                There are a few power users like them around here and it can be fun to watch them argue with folks. Perhaps they just enjoy the act of arguing? They might just be malicious, but I prefer to imagine that most people are trying their best to engage in good faith more often than not.

            • bladerunnerspider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Don’t you think the people selling it would want to sell it at the higher medical grade price than to fucking Dollar Tree one bottle at time? Given the choice they would provide it for medical use.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                It’s not about total revenue, it’s profit margin…

                If medical grade sells for $1k/unit, and balloon sells for $10/unit, but it costs $1k/unit to refine…

                They’re gonna want to sell it for balloons.

                Because while it’s essentially a finate resource, on a capitalist timescale there’s a lot.

                They’re fine fucking over the people 500 years from now, because they get rich now.

                Which is why I keep using the example of the fossil fuel industry.

                Capitalists care about their own capital, not future society generations from now.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is like saying gold nuggets are worthless because people want refined products made of gold…

        It’s fucking helium bro, it’s easy to separate it from anything else. Because it’s the lightest noble gas…

        Fill a balloon with 10% helium and 90% atmosphere, and the top 10% of the balloon is pure helium.

        That’s how easy it is to sepeeate it.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Well, when someone is having difficulty understanding something, people tend to dumb it down, hopefully to the point the other person finally understands.

            Unfortunately sometimes that’s not possible, in the worse cases the idiot starts acting like you’re not specific enough and that’s the problem.

            That’s like the universal sign it’s a waste of time.

            • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              What does any of that have to do with you correcting me without doing even a modicum of research or having any familiarity with the topic?

              The fuck is wrong with people here…

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s a gas. It’s effectively defined by the fact that the individual particles have too much energy to settle like that.

          Separating a lot of liquids has similar issues though.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Noble gas means it doesn’t chemically react.

              It doesn’t mean you can easily separate it from a bunch of other gases in the same space.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                It doesn’t mean you can easily separate it from a bunch of other gases in the same space

                When it’s the lightest noble gas it does…

                When literally the only lighter gas is hydrogen, which combines easily with oxygen to produce a liquid, it becomes pretty fucking easy.

                Seriously, you couldn’t ask for an easier gas to separate.

                • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  You understand how much these companies could make if they were capable of purifying the helium further to sell to all the places that desperately need pure helium?

                  They have loads of resources and haven’t figured it out, because it’s nowhere near as easy as you’re pretending. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          it’s much more complicated than that, and the most useful property of helium is its low boiling point. it goes like this:

          first, you start with natural gas that has some nitrogen, some water, some helium, some carbon dioxide, heavier hydrocarbons, thiols, dust, and such. mechanical filtering gets rid of dust and mist, water, carbon dioxide and thiols are removed chemically, heavier hydrocarbons are removed on active carbon. now we have mix of methane, ethane, hydrogen, helium, nitrogen, traces of carbon monoxide, dioxide and water. this all is cooled down, first just to freeze out these trace amounts of water and carbon dioxide, then to liquefy what is left.

          next this liquid mixture is put through massive distillation tower, allowing for separation of mainly nitrogen and methane. this nitrogen and methane are end products, some are sold as liquids but most are regasified in order to cool down incoming gas and save some energy. another product is helium concentrate, at this point it can be 50% to 80% with rest being nitrogen but this depends on exact facility.

          then, some extra air is added to helium concentrate, it’s heated up and passed over catalyst bed. this is done in order to burn out hydrogen and any hydrocarbons, because separating oxygen from helium is much easier than separating hydrogen from helium. products of this burn are water and carbon dioxide that can be separated chemically. then again it’s all cooled down, nitrogen and oxygen are liquefied, then it’s all cooled down further and from some 30K on it’s just helium being circulated as gas because you can’t liquefy it like any other gases, it needs a special process. on every pass, with extensive recycling of heat some part of it is liquified and this is the final output, 5N liquid helium.

          at least that’s how it works in a facility built in 70s in then eastern block. now it supplies half of europe and a research facility situated nearby. i suspect it was built with at least some military applications in mind during this time, namely helium is used for pressurizing hydrogen tanks of rockets, but also soviets toyed with an idea of using gas lasers militarily. this requires a supply of helium, and a supply of neon is also a nice thing to have in this situation. neon was produced in Azovstal cryogenic oxygen factory serving nearby steelworks, as it can be separated from air. it ended up providing virtually all neon for semiconductor manufacturing in the world, but from what i understand there are alternative suppliers by now

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            it’s much more complicated than that

            But compared to extracting other gases (which virtually all of them aren’t finite) it is that easy

            • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              it’s pretty fucking hard. only six countries in the world produce helium, and you get engineering challenges that don’t exist anywhere else. for example you can’t use any grease on helium turbine bearings in the lower temperature stages because all of them freeze, so the solution is to use gas lubricated bearings. this is some serious precision engineering that has to work in extreme conditions

              it’s also hard because the simpler way of liquefying gases, like the one used for nitrogen that uses no moving parts in the coldest part, fails for helium, this makes liquefying helium harder than any other gas. it’s also hard because of limited availability. it’s hard because of massive capital costs and lots of custom machinery. it’s hard because of scale required. about any other compound can be manufactured without at least some of these problems

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        right or wrong, you’re an asshole. Nobody did anything but disagree with you, you’re the only one insulting strangers. Quit being an ass.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Hopefully we stop wasting this limited resource on fucking balloons.

      I don’t recommend fucking balloons. The squeaks are annoying and the pops hurt.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      helium just boils off in MRI/NMR machines, this is the major use of helium i think. if you could recycle that in machines that already are out there, that would solve lots of problems. there are newer systems that do not require cryogens or just require liquid nitrogen which is much cheaper and less energy intensive. these things use closed loop refrigeration, but in turn you need to supply them with power

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sounds like superconductor research could end up fixing that problem. Once we have a suitable conductor material, you no longer need to keep it that cool.

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          not exactly, because if someone finds out that high temperature superconductor works even better at 4K, then it will be running at 4K, making entire thing more compact or allowing for higher fields

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think for balloons we should switch back to hydrogen. What could possibly go wrong?

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The helium used for balloons is not the same type of helium used in medical and scientific equipment.

      • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Wdym? The only difference is the helium gas used in more serious applications is more pure. Its helium all the same.

          • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Helium-3 is not used in general applications, its uses are far more niche, it is much more rare than helium 4. For most applications, when we talk about helium being used we mean plain old helium-4. MRI machines and balloons both use helium-4.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not really, because we’re still pissing away invaluable helium because of capitalism…

      If we keep doing that, it doesn’t really matter how much we find.

      We need to stop wasting it first, then finding huge supplies is a good thing. As long as we’re not dumb enough to start wasting it again.

        • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah it’ll hopefully see us through to when we’re collecting it in space - there’s plenty up there and they’ve already come up with some good ways of collecting it

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Imagine we found out climate change predictions were a decade early, so we kept pace and didn’t use the extra time to try and fix it…

          It’s not bad news that we got another decade, but it doesn’t matter that much in the long run if we still don’t fix the underlying issue

          • drislands@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t disagree with your general point. But finding a new source of Helium, regardless of the rate of use, is a good thing.

            That aside – are you saying Helium is related to climate change? Curious to know how, if so.

            • stembolts@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Edit : minor addition. I was reading a comment the other day and found out helium can also result from other reactions outside of a star, such as the decay of a radioactive element, which ejects an alpha particle (which is just a helium molecule with special attributes, aka no electrons). The alpha particle crashes into something, picks up electrons and suddenly its a helium.

              No, they are clearly making the following comparison.

              1. For climate change : World is heating up, heading toward the result of mass extinctions. The most valuable resource is the time to act. Ten extra years to work on the root cause. Unsustainable emissions.

              2. For Helium : A finite resource is being exhausted, heading toward a world with no helium (helium is typically created by one of the fusion cycles in the core of a star, fusion is a nascient technology on earth). The most valuable resource is time to act, +X% helium extra supply to address the root cause, unsustainable consumption.

              In both cases, the root cause is being (mostly) ignored.

              So they’re pointing out that if you have 800 finite helium, then suddenly you find out you have 880 helium… that hasn’t changed the finite nature of the helium. The root cause remains a “spending problem”. And they are likely annoyed that 880 ~> 880 results in, " Omg yay!" vs what should be, “Oh thank goodness, more time to address the root cause of consumption.”

              Idk, was that not obvious? I’m not being facetious here, I’m really asking. Brings to mind the “curse of knowledge” fallacy where when you understand something you assume others do, and they often don’t, resulting in disjointed communication where the listener can’t grasp the idea. As condescending as this sounds I assure you its only because I’m not a writer, I’m legitimately making an attempt to communicate neutrally with you as we both seem to have genuine interest.

              Anyway, corrections and such always welcome. All numbers in this post made up for illustrative purposes only.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        How are we wasting it? Keep in mind that the helium used for stuff like balloons is not the same as the helium used in medical equipment. Also keep in mind that even if it were, the amount of helium used in balloons would be less than 1% of total usage.

        So I ask again, how are we wasting it?