There’s no way they didn’t mean the layer of tp dust that comes from some extra soft brands of toilet paper.

While I don’t agree, your post is shittier than OPs

I’m not saying this dude is right for any of his actions, but also this comment is mega creepy.

Next up, we asked a shoe to write a haiku but it was beaten by a 30 year old HaikuMaker™®©.

This is like a food truck with extra steps.

Fake stuff? Next you’ll tell me that the dragons in that new How to Train Your Dragon movie aren’t really dragons.

I know you’re incapable of complex thought. I hope you do too, friend.

Disagree. They’re just another outlet of creative expression, if used to do so.

Here’s some feedback on how to improve for ya, get better opinions and stop parroting the boring anti creative narrative lemmy users have.

Remember when they named their voice assistant after a video game character?

Don’t forget the, “I’m a very wealthy man”, televangelist who owns at least 3 personal jets.

sniff sniff

Smells like hater. Come back with a valuable comment or proof of your reason for existence.

If you can’t say anything nice, it’s okay. Don’t say anything at all.

It wouldn’t be lemmy if we weren’t always in a moral size measuring contest.

I don’t agree at all, the hype was evident, sure, but the procedural generation was largely the reason people didn’t like the game.

You stated that procedural generation isn’t hated, but ‘botching’ the usage of it at release is the piece that irrelevant. The people hated it because of the, admittably bad, procedural generation.

Like procedural generation, generative assets that are done well will be either indistinguishable from hand work, likely because there will be some involved, or will be incorporated in a way that they mesh well with everything else.

Everyone hated the procedural generation in no man’s sky, for example, until enough work was done to make that just a piece of the game.