You just seem ambiently angry

Thank you for claiming that Badguyism literally does not exist. It makes it very easy to know that you are a fundamentally unserious person who I don’t need to listen to at all.

Lol you’ve got nothing

It’s always the same, you guys always just throw out a couple proper nouns and a pejorative term and hope that’s the same as making an actual point. Well, it isnt: not when you’re talking to people who actually know about this shit.

Then what does it mean?

simping

I’m not a political expert, is it good or bad when your political ideology uses incel lingo to lie to itself about what it’s opponents think?

Because you lack the ability to remember your own point?

That’s true, it’s all the rights that makes a right

Why do so many of you guys talk like you own a decorative cane you don’t need

Lol a meme should be easy to dismiss or respond to but I have never once seen libs have a counter to this specific one.

your kind

Angry 12 year old phrasing detected

Three hundred million tourists, not a typo, passed through Xinjiang last year. Not a single tiktok of anything amiss.

Cucumber agua fresca is more refreshing than literally anything else on earth. The mana of life, the human hummingbird fuel, the good bright green stuff

I can’t tell if this is a joke

Not even trying with the names anymore

That’s the trick: in Liberalism, “personal expression” just means “your money can do whatever it wants”. Liberal freedom is capitalist freedom: the freedom for the rich to run roughshod over the poor

You sound like you came up in the church and have heard a lot of weird bullshit about China

👋You know it’s bad when you start getting recognized on your arguing account

“If the Koreans didn’t build things, it was because the country was a failed hellhole. But when in fact they built very impressive things, it was because of slavery. No evidence of slavery was ever found: it was simply taken on faith that they’re the Bad Guys, and that’s what Bad Guys do, so they must do it.”

What we’re dealing with is an unfalsifiable orthodoxy