Neeva was faster, simpler, and ad-free. But making something better than Google isn’t enough to beat Google.
    • negativenull@negativenull.com
      8·
      1 year ago

      I used them for a while as well. Their search was good, and their auto-generated answers they provided was very decent. I loved the idea of non-ad supported search. For me, their problem was their value proposition. You could use search for free, but you have to pay them if you want them to index your github/dropbox/etc accounts, so they could be searchable from the same searchbox. I had no need to have any private accounts searched, so never needed those licensed features.

  • Irina@beehaw.org
    12·
    1 year ago

    I’ve heard good things about Kagi, but I can’t justify the cost (especially as its USD)

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      14·
      1 year ago

      If it were half the cost or if all the tiers had unlimited searches I’d probably subscribe, but I don’t want to ration the searches the way I used to have to ration dialup minutes.

      • blindsight@beehaw.org
        7·
        1 year ago

        This is what I felt about Neeva, too. Metered searches meant I only used it when I “needed” it… By which point I was mired in search results and focused on my Google Fu and completely forgot about Neeva.

        I get that it costs money to run, but they needed a long free trial to get me hooked, then a reasonably priced unlimited tier. I was never going to use a site that restricts my search volume.

        • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
          2·
          1 year ago

          There was a limit to Neeva? I payed $55/year for unlimited searches, but maybe I was in some tier that became unavailable or something.

          I think that has set my price expectations.

          • blindsight@beehaw.org
            2·
            1 year ago

            iirc, their trial tier was 100 searches total, or something like. I could never adequately test it so I never converted to a paid user.

      • cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me
        3·
        1 year ago

        They pay for every search you do, so they can’t really offer unlimited at a low price point. FWIW, I don’t ration my searches. I used my FF history to count DDG searches back in early beta of Kagi and it resulted in about 1k per month, with Kagi (which shows the count), I’m at 700-800 which fits comfortably into the 1k limit (technically I have 1.3k because I was an early adopter, but I didn’t hit over 1k even once).

        FWIW, the unlimited plan would be too expensive for me as well, and that’s with me absolutely loving Kagi.

      • Irina@beehaw.org
        3·
        1 year ago

        even at US$5 a month, I don’t know. I feel like most searches I do are just to get to the website I already know the name of, and I’d blow through 300 pretty fast.

        • cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me
          4·
          1 year ago

          I feel like most searches I do are just to get to the website I already know the name of

          Not exactly Kagi specific, but I guess it helps if you are on the lite plan: Use bangs. Want SO results? !so Want to search imdb? !imdb Rotten Tomatoes? !rt Metal Archives? !mab

          I’d not use Kagi without bangs, and that’s despite having 1k or so searches per month.

  • hugz@kbin.social
    5·
    1 year ago

    I was a Neeva user. It was good, but no better than DDG. Google is so bad these days that it isn’t much better than DDG, aside from regional things

    • CuriousGoo@beehaw.org
      1·
      1 year ago

      I just use DDG, and I was told in a different post that it fetches results through Bing.

      Much like what you said, Google is better than other engines with regional results being a non-US person.

  • pokexpert30@lemmy.pussthecat.org
    4·
    1 year ago

    Google is still the GOAT for very specific questions. Like “docker network bridge partial packet loss” , throw it into bing/dfg/qwang and you just end up with “what is a network bridge in docker”