Not sure how anyone can look at this and believe these two things concurrently:
1.) This is acceptable, and…
2.) I’m not the bad guy
There is really no acceptable justification for any of this, tbh. If there are still “bad people” and “terrorists” in Gaza, why doesn’t Israel just man up and go get them instead of starving this random person to death?
Not sure how anyone can look at this and believe these two things concurrently:
1.) This is acceptable, and… 2.) I’m not the bad guy
There is really no acceptable justification for any of this, tbh. If there are still “bad people” and “terrorists” in Gaza, why doesn’t Israel just man up and go get them instead of starving this random person to death?
“Because this random starving person is a terrorist-in-training.”, says the people training the terrorists.
Also “terrorists make money off aid” only works if aid is scarce. The entire “argument” is circular logic.