• Bjarne@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Was really hoping to see a Fairphone 6a. Similar to the Google Pixel Series. Just a cheap version of it. I really don’t need 120Hz, OLED or “No Bezels” all i want is big battery and a headphone jack that is all.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Worth noting buying a second hand phone is still better in every aspect and sadly 2nd hand Samsung from 3 years ago is still better and cheaper. Though Fairphone is getting closer with each release!

  • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    a few things i like:

    • moments is an interesting concept
    • it says you can toggle off gemini ai. this is good
    • display goes from 10-120hz for battery
    • ultrawide selfie camera
    • microsd card slot!
    • power button fingerprint scanner, way better than underscreen
  • adr1an@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s a deGoogled version too!!

    I would prefer GrapheneOS (If I can live with the irony of getting a Pixel phone just to deGoogle it…). Sandboxing there is way better. But you lose the Repairability… Gotta check and compare the new EU metrics too.

    They are just two different devices.

    • adr1an@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just an update, I learnt that GrapheneOS developers are ‘aggressive’ towards other FLOSS projects (following comments on other thread, but you can searx grepheneos+controversy and see for yourselves).

      So now, I might just prefer an FP6.

    • Mora@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I not only want a degoogled version but also a secure one. Sadly developing a secure android is rather hard. The Graphene team does it pretty well. Others try it too, but sadly they are not close.

      • pinesolcario@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        People don’t want to pay for privacy. That’s the real problem with end users. Imagine if more people did so. What a world we could have. Nah. Let’s be cheap AF!

        • proceduralnightshade@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          Locking privacy behind a paywall? Sounds like a nightmare.

          That’s the real problem with end users.

          The real problem with end users is that they buy according to whatever needs corpos inject via advertising.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Because the built in software is usually there because the manufacturer is receiving money from the software company. That’s why consumer devices are always bloated with garbage.

      • kepix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        the degoogled roms like eos calyx lineage graphene are not just aosp zero work roms with no gapps inclueded. the devs do work on changing as much google related code as they can even within aosp. nothing is perfect obviously, but im pretty sure there are compatible mobile linux distros even.

  • carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Compared to the Fairphone 5 it has some improvements but also a few downsides:

    Pro:

    • It’s a bit smaller (~4mm) and lighter (~20g)
    • Slightly better camera (future tests will tell how much better)
    • 120 Hz display
    • More RAM and storage (although I feel that the previous 6GB/128GB option was also sufficient for most users)
    • WiFi 6E Tri-Band (however you will likely never need this speed)
    • Bluetooth 5.4
    • Slightly larger battery

    Con:

    • Backpanel now requires a screwdriver
    • Display has less resolution/PPI
    • Performance of processor will likely be nearly identical to predecessor (however it’s more efficient and modern)
    • Downgrade to USB 2
    • 600€

    My conclusion: Overall the improvements are ok, however just releasing the Fairphone 5 with a newer SoC might have been the better/more cost effective choice. Sacrificing display resolution for 120 Hz feels also quite wrong. 600€ is very pricy for a phone like this. Cutting some premium features away like the 120 Hz display or a bit of RAM and storage (that you can extend anyway with an SD card) might have saved enough to get the launch price down to somewhere near 500€ which would make it accessible for a wider audience.

  • bonus_crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    love fairphone but i cant go bacl from graphene os. its so nice not having google attacjed to everything.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I just want them to make a true flagship phone. I personally wouldn’t mind paying extra for a more ethical phone, if it had all the bells and whistles and wasn’t half obsolete straight out of the box.

  • phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Why does The Fairphone (Gen. 6) not have an audio jack?

    After some of the criticism that we received about removing the headphone jack from Fairphone 4, we did consider bringing it back for The Fairphone (Gen. 6). However, we realized it would be at the expense of increasing the phone’s dimensions. We also looked into the consumer data and Fairphone 4’s weight and thickness were more of an issue than the lack of a minijack, so we decided to keep the same approach, although it was a difficult decision. We didn’t want to invest in OLED technology for the display and then not have improved the phone’s dimensions and weight. But just like with Fairphone 4 and Fairphone 5, we will still offer an adapter, which has had overall positive user reviews.

    “We heard the criticism but decided that no, you would still need an adapter to use headphones, plus a USB-C hub to be able to charge the damn thing while listening to music or watching videos”

    Funny how that’s the same excuses that we get for modern laptops terrible design. “We HAVE to make it thinner so there’s no space! You wouldn’t want a laptop that’s not complete shit if it meant it’d also be less thin and breakable, now would you?”

  • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I bought an oled phone for 200€ a few years back. What I’d really want is that every smartphone sold in the EU is open, with open drivers and OS with root access if you want to. And some investments by the EU to support open smartphone OS.

    What a shithole civilization.

  • squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I would totally buy one of these if they were sold in the US. Sadly, last time I checked the newest phone wasn’t sold here. So I doubt this one will be.