zodo123@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 year agoSeattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from sudden 'deactivation'kuow.orgexternal-linkmessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1255arrow-down13
arrow-up1252arrow-down1external-linkSeattle becomes first in U.S. to protect gig workers from sudden 'deactivation'kuow.orgzodo123@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up25·1 year agoI have never done a gig job but I don’t think they really have a contract. That’s the whole problem is it’s smoke and mirrors. I’m open to gig jobs but I think they need more regulation to make sure the workers are not abused. Also suing is easier said than done. They have Billions. Uber would fight it in court since you couldn’t afford to take it there
minus-squareArakwar@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down6·1 year agoGig jobs with regulations are just normal job. Why do people support adding complexity to an already complex system?
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoNot really. It’s a work for hire and not a W2 job. They’re paid 1099. We already have regulations around 1099 workers and we need more
I have never done a gig job but I don’t think they really have a contract. That’s the whole problem is it’s smoke and mirrors.
I’m open to gig jobs but I think they need more regulation to make sure the workers are not abused.
Also suing is easier said than done. They have Billions. Uber would fight it in court since you couldn’t afford to take it there
deleted by creator
Gig jobs with regulations are just normal job. Why do people support adding complexity to an already complex system?
Not really. It’s a work for hire and not a W2 job. They’re paid 1099. We already have regulations around 1099 workers and we need more