• queermunist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is literally idealism.

    You have an idea about a market solution to the problem, and then act like you’ve solved the problem.

    The problem isn’t a lack of ideas! The problem is a lack of implementation! You have to get these ideas into the real world somehow, and revolution is the only way you can do that. There are billionaires aligned against implementing these ideas. You have to stop them.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Revolution is also more than eating the rich. Its also setting a framework for the future through non-violent action. Organizing and interacting both with local communities and national and international concerns.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        So we all burn while you try to change the system instead of focusing on the problem at hand. Great and thanks.

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did I say that was the only thing?

          Because if you ignore this now to burn down the rich, you’ll be burning later anyways.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its over man, I just look at those sad little true believers as pathetic comic relief.

      They’d be the ones in the town squares pre-revolution scolding passers by for not blindly following the wisdom of their oppressive monarchs.

      • queermunist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re the peasants that revolt against their local lord while still being loyal to the king, because surely the problem is just that the king has bad advisors and the local lord is corrupt!

        • Cabrio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re the voters stupid enough to vote against their interests, and there’s no shortage of them. Serfs gonna serf.

    • galloog1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not idealism. If you have a better solution that is not radical by design, go ahead. I was literally not specific intentionally. Go ahead, what instrument within the current system would work that are not regulations?

      • queermunist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Regulations don’t work when they don’t get implemented, which means your ideas are purely ideas and not materialistic solutions. There aren’t going to be any regulations, don’t you get it? That ship has so obviously sailed.

        There isn’t a better solution that’s not radical and that’s why radical solutions all that’s left!

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Which country is the model to emulate? Which country has had the successful revolution?

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many countries have successfully overthrown previous governments and implemented new ones. It depends what you mean by ‘successful’.

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          It depends what you mean by ‘successful’.

          I’m asking which ones did it by their definition of successful. Which country should we emulate?

          • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There will be people who thought it was successful, and people who thought it was unsuccessful, in every revolution. You’d need to clarify who ‘they’ are.

          • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            And as for me, I’m not sure there’s anything we can do about this, even with a revolution - at least with such a small number of us that actually care. If the majority actually wanted to change from the status quo, maybe then a revolution could work.

      • K3zi4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, I mean, historically, the USA had a very successful revolution in that they have become the greatest world power nowadays…

        Even if they are a capitalist crazed two party nation, where a majority struggle to survive and they have to pay for the basic human right of healthcare, all in the name of some “free market” to help the rich get richer at their own expense.

        • galloog1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, you are saying we should emulate the United States? Are you following this conversation?

          • K3zi4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not what I said. I gave an example of a “successful” revolution.

            • galloog1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              In the conversation on which successful country to emulate. I think the point is that one doesn’t exist that’s been successful. It’s a societal filter.