• macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    We can only hope. But then again, we saw how people act when it comes to those changes. They will try it for a bit but then fall right back and accept the shit they wanted to flee from.

    • margaritox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, Firefox is actually a good browser. I’ve switched to Firefox ever since I heard about the upcoming changes and have never wanted to switch back.

    • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      i switched to a chromium browser for features that have since been added to firefox. if something serious were to happen, i will gladly switch back over.

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          He means “if it actually happens/my shit stops working one day” he will switch.

          We’ve been listening to this shit for like 2 years between Manifest V3 and this, I’ve never had a single difference in ads that entire time on Vivaldi.

          It’s got baked in features that run lighter than what Firefox would be with the equivalent extensions and plugins, if it stops working then I’ll switch. Running Firefox isn’t going to stop this from happening, if and when. Only massive user backlash after implementation will solve the issue, same as when Lemmy was created.

          • Heavybell@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I seriously doubt any amount of user backlash will help put the genie back in the bottle, once it’s out. And nobody is going to change to the browser that can’t access the popular site du jour that now requires WEI attestation to access. If WEI gets rolling it’ll be impossible to fight.

            That said I totally understand this is almost certainly already lost. Chromium’s market share is unassailable and there’s no way we can convince enough people to swap off it until there’s nothing to swap to. It just sucks to think nothing can be done, so please forgive people like me for trying anyway.

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your version of trying is just shouting at the same group of 2000 people nonstop. Everyone here is already onboard or isn’t going to.

              I highly doubt everyone is just going to go “oh damn, Brave/Vivaldi/Firefox stopped working, guess I just HAVE to download chrome now.”

              Like you realize monopoly and antitrust lawsuits are a thing, right? If the ONLY option is Chrome via WEI there will be a lawsuit about fifteen minutes behind it.

              • Heavybell@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It won’t be the only option, it’ll just be the only practical option because some sites will only support WEI. I see any antitrust case being rejected on those grounds, and on the grounds of other browsers choosing not to support WEI.

    • Gamey@feddit.rocks
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On one hand I agree but on the other I feel like ads are a lot more trouble than a new browser to most users so that part might actually work for us. The really sad thing is that all browsers want to support all majore websites and once something like Youtube requires web DRM we basically lost because everyone will add it! :/

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Firefox is faster than ever, and I trust Mozilla a fair bit more than Google to not be shady with my data. The switch is painless, and ads these days cover what feels like over half the page… it’s insane.

    I run ff on my phone and PC, with all the privacy settings maxed. Ublock also works on Android and makes those trashy BuzzFeed style sites readable.

  • Fest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    thank you for posting the image directly on the instance youre using and not on some random website ive never heard about before that still uses http

  • lemillionsocks@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know that the jump to chrom was aided by a number of factors, with one of the bigger ones being how fluid technology use was at the time. Everything was new and anything could become number 1.

    Still it’s so frustrating that when firefox had the memory leak and “took a long time to launch” the web was flooded with complaints and people jumping to chrome and congratulating google on what a modern browser they built.

    Meanwhile everytime chrome gets caught with high memory usage, pushing their own web standards, or destroying adblock and a free web as we know it, the internet as a whole shrugs as if there isnt anything that can be done.

    • rckclmbr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Remember Google AMP? And Google was proxying sites that implemented it? That shit would have been so abused if it had reached as critical mass as Chrome

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not gonna lie, unlike just of you guys I don’t really care for ad blocking. I pay for YouTube premium and other sites I visit I don’t really get bothered by it.

    However I’m more disturbed about the overreach this is and the control we’re giving to Google or whoever. That’s the reason I use Firefox.

    • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its like a ransom if the stakes were as low as possible. They hold your state of non-annoyance hostage and ask for a negligible amount for it so no one gets emotionally involved in this exchange regardless of whether or not they wanna pay the ransom. Instead of subterfuge or the threat of violence they “get away with it” by nature of being generally inconsequential.

      All this to say, seeing as you payed the “ransom”, I would personally describe you as more bothered by ads than anyone else. Not a value judgement, just an observation.

      In order of least to most bothered by ads, doesn’t it make sense to assume

      1. People who watch ads (unbothered)

      2. People who install adblockers (somewhat bothered)

      3. People that pay money to remove ads (extremely bothered)

  • Mandy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We both know barely a single person this is referring to even knows what a browser is

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ads are annoying yes, but I can understand why they’re there. And for ones that you just scroll by, it’s nbd, really.

    It’s the ones that don’t scroll past and just cover a chunk of screen til you manually close them that should never be allowed in any context, ever, at all. I don’t care if the advertiser is paying me in free hourly blowjobs, forcing me to make an extra click is unforgivable in any circumstance. Especially on mobile pages, where they tend to stack up, or decide that your “close” click is actually a “take me to your offer, please” click, if it even counts at all. Or I guess I mean tap.

  • Rizoid@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve tried firefox in the past. Back and forth I go when google does something dumb but I always go back. This time I think I’ll deal with the stuff I don’t like for now, or maybe make extensions to fill the voids that I miss desperately.

    • drekly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been using it since the start of the year, the transition was pretty simple. what don’t you like?

      • Rizoid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I rely on chromes tab groupings. Nothing in Firefox does as good a job, but I’m getting by just fine for now.

        • drekly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why so many tabs? I close as I go else it’s a cluttered mess.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is your solution to Firefox not having proper tab grouping “why do you need tab grouping?” Lol

            • drekly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I don’t have a solution, so I’m having a conversation about it.

              Don’t treat me like I own Firefox and it’s my job to convert everyone.

                • drekly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’m just asking questions, as I haven’t personally had many issues. I’ve had some, but not the ones mentioned by the people here. I feel like people would prefer to have a browser with an ad blocker so I’m interested in what hurdles people are finding that may be stopping them.

                  Not everything is an argument.

          • Rizoid@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I usually have 30+ tabs grouped around in chrome. I got a lot going on and it helps keep my ADHD in check when I’m trying to work on something.

            • drekly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              My version is starred emails in Gmail and folders full of bookmarks instead 😅

              I hope they integrate a tab grouping functionality for you tab hoarders soon!

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        15 years ago, Firefox would cause my desktop computer to spin up its really loud fan once or twice an hour. It was a room away from my bedroom, but it was enough to wake up my (now) wife, who was angry, but unable to identify the source of the noise. That lasted for a few weeks before I noticed it during the day. When I switched to Chrome, it stopped.

        It’s totally unreasonable, but it’s enough to keep me off Firefox. I’m sure both browsers have been rewritten multiple times since then.

        Well, it was, until the whole “web integrity thing”.

        • drekly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. That does sound unreasonable haha.

          I used to use Firefox before chrome released. It used to be the best, but chrome took the crown after Firefox became a memory eater.

          Now chrome is being all iTunes walled garden, and Firefox also recently overtook it in terms of speed.

          I installed it alongside my trusty chrome install, played around with extensions(or add-ons) until the experience mostly matched, and switched over once I was satisfied.

          Chrome’s still installed if I need it, but I haven’t needed it!

          It’s worth a go at least!

      • sidewalker@thesidewalkends.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. This. Chrome’s multi-profile mode is perfect. Firefox’s about:profile bullshit is just awful.

        Im still FireFox only, but I would love to see some improvement in this area.

        • Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed - they really just need to roll the ‘Profile Switcher for Firefox’ extension into base functionality - and this would have the benefit of not requiring an additional install to work.

    • Hellfire103@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Pretty much every Windows and Android user. At my school Chrome is the standard, so I ended up taking in Phyrox on a stick until I could start bringing my own hardware.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just tried Firefox: Startup took around 40 seconds, UI was not responsive at all, and I couldn’t install locally developed extensions.

    • Veedem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      40 seconds? I’ve never experienced that with Firefox at all. You’re either being hyperbolic or have an ancient computer. I have a Samsung Windows 10 machine from 2015 that opens Firefox just as quickly as it opens Chrome.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But I wonder, why. No other application behaves like this. Even heavyweights like Kdenlive start up within 2-3 seconds.

        Unfortunately Firefox does not print anything out on command line so I have no way to debug this.

    • jinarched@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      40 seconds to boot? I’ve never experienced this even on my 20 years old potatoe. I find that very hard to believe.

    • waka@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      40 seconds startup?! What? Should open within like 2-3 Seconds. 5 if your system RAM is maxing out.

      Abou locally developed extensions, you will need to follow the specific developer directions on that. But if you code, you should’ve figured that out already. If not, you tried doing shady things, which Firefox rightfully blocked.

    • DarkenLM@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I also experienced this, and immediately after a reinstall, Firefox decided that it didn’t like to be reinstalled and bricked my OS. I had to completely reinstall it because the boot section was nowhere to be found, and barely any data was salvageable.

      So, even if Chrome is bad, I prefer to use Ungoogled Chromium or other chromium forks that don’t nuke my computer than using a browser that has consistently given me extreme problems.