• original_ish_name@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Refuse. They can’t force you to use it. If they want you to use discord, say you only use matrix. If they want you to use chromeos, say you only use GNU/Linux

    • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They can’t force you to use it.

      No, but they can fail you for not participating in required class exercises.

      • original_ish_name@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No? It’s not their hardware and even if it was they can’t force you to use that hardware. I’m not sure about the laws around it but I do know schools can’t force you to agree to contracts (such as EULAs)

        • 0xACAB [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe times have changed but when I was in school a decade ago they would just say I don’t care and punish you for not doing your work lol, they can absolutely make you use it by virtue of being in charge

        • breadcodes@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Schools sign the contracts themselves for license deals. The program either doesn’t collect the same data, or doesn’t collect anything other than analytics.

          They do this in Enterprise too. All of our enterprise software is a special version made for distribution. No EULA is involved.

          • grue@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            LOL, maybe in a competent school system. Meanwhile, in my kids’ school system even things like signing up to pay for school lunches is outsourced to some shitty third-party service with an outrageous ToS that includes a binding arbitration clause with said arbitration being conducted in Louisiana (a different state hundreds of miles away).