• DavyJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    When OpenAI commits copyright infringement no one bats an eye, but when I do it everyone downvotes me

    • DrM@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I don’t get it. ChatGPT is not “Fair use” and there is no credit given to anyone, it’s a solid case against them

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just wonder if they’ll get out of it because LLMs do reword the information instead of spitting it back out verbatim. It’s the same reason I think the image generators are safe from copyright law - it’s just different enough that they could plausibly convince a judge with a fair use argument.

        What bothers me even more is all the text they had to scrape to create ChatGPT… That seems like a novel problem for the legal system because you know there’s no way they paid for all of it.

        • DrM@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t matter. For it to be fair use under American law they would need to give full credit, which they obviously don’t.

      • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not 100% sure where I stand but, for arguments sake; Are you sure about that? it sure is transformative!

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Classic joke, something like: if you owe the bank $100, it’s your problem; if you owe them a million, it’s their problem.