ericjmorey@programming.dev to Selfhosted@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThis should be a pinned post as it really captures the essence of my experience so far.programming.devexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1211arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1210arrow-down1external-linkThis should be a pinned post as it really captures the essence of my experience so far.programming.devericjmorey@programming.dev to Selfhosted@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square40fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTrustingZebra@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoDo you remember what the original was?
minus-squareDadifer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoFunny, now it’s easy to check for birds.
minus-squarelemmyvore@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoIf by “easy” you mean someone else already spent 5 years and a nice chunk of cash training a model for it, which you get to use. And if you accept that it will not be accurate across all possible species and environments, only very specific subsets.
minus-squareericjmorey@programming.devOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoThis is original work. The source is in the post.
minus-squareSheeEttin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoFor a generous definition of “original”. Edit: very generous, since it’s just new text on the second panel in https://xkcd.com/1269/
Do you remember what the original was?
I think it’s https://xkcd.com/1425/
Funny, now it’s easy to check for birds.
If by “easy” you mean someone else already spent 5 years and a nice chunk of cash training a model for it, which you get to use. And if you accept that it will not be accurate across all possible species and environments, only very specific subsets.
This is original work. The source is in the post.
For a generous definition of “original”.
Edit: very generous, since it’s just new text on the second panel in https://xkcd.com/1269/