• charje@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Copyleft licences are the only true free software licences. All other open source licenses are just proprietariable.

      • GregoryTheGreat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not a joke.

        Copy left is like the Robin Hood of the copyright world. Basically, it’s a type of licensing where, sure, you can use, modify, and distribute the copyrighted work, but there’s a catch. You have to give the same rights to anyone else for any derivative works. So, if you modify the work, you can’t just slap a new copyright on it and restrict its use. It’s a way to ensure that the work stays free for everyone to use. It’s pretty popular in the open source community. It’s like copyright turned on its head, hence the name “copyleft”.

  • bela@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    gets thrown out along eith all his buddies.

    “Free” achieved!

      • MJBrune@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t like how it forces everything it touches to be GPL. Even if the works it touches are unrelated to the original functionality. It restricts what I can do with the code I wrote without the help of the GPL’ed code. For example, if I write an entire game: gameplay, physics, renderer, networking, etc., all myself. Then I need to include a snippet of GPL’ed code for any reason, all that work now no longer belongs to me. I, the worker, no longer have access to the fruit of my labor. Instead all of it, disproportionally, is given away to the collective world. I lose the fruits of my labor.

        With others, I do not. You can give your code to the community, you can even adopt licenses to say if you improve the code you must also open source it and give it to the community but when you then say and you also have to give away any code it touches inconsequential to it’s functionality. That feels too restrictive for me. I honestly would like to see people adopt a middle ground. LGPL does this afaik and it feels like a better choice than GPL or BSD if you are trying to keep just your creation and it’s derivatives open.

        • pancake@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you use my snippet, I want your game. If you don’t agree, then you can’t use my snippet. The purpose of the GPL is simply to prevent people who don’t share from benefitting from people who do, which I think is pretty fair.

          • MJBrune@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, it’s a disagreement on what fair sharing is, and honestly. I don’t want your code if I can’t meet the intent of the license. That’s fine. It’s just the reason I don’t GPL my code. It feels like I am enacting restrictions on someone else that doesn’t feel fair.

  • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is part of why universities generally have it in the admissions agreement that the university will hold copyright over all that you do for your classes

  • gooey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not pictured: OP and all their classmates failing the assignment and being investigated for plagiarism