• kuneho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m gonna try this out. I like OsmAnd~, but sometimes it feels like it’s like shooting out of cannon to sparrows (which is one thing I love about it).

  • DSN9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I still think osm needs better business listings, maybe the fine ladies at Anna’s can scrape Google maps 🚬

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That’s true, there are some projects to bring features like street view/360 view, interactive business listings, internal views, etc. In my area, I still have to switch back and forth between Google and OSM, but some areas are much more complete. It just depends on where you live and which specific features you rely on.

      It will never come from scraping a copyrighted source, as that would be fundamentally against the ethos of the project 🤷

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    22 hours ago

    As a contributor to OSM, I didn’t know about what was going on with Organic Maps. I might check out CoMaps on F-Droid to see how it compares with OsmAnd~. Thanks, OP!

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Admittedly I only read this open letter and so am still too out-of-the-loop to say if Organic Maps is in the wrong here. Still, it seems like a sizable and competent enough fork that my initial bias is against Organic Maps.

        • digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          22 hours ago

          “Profit off the free contributions to inflate shareholder value” is about the gist of it from what was summarized. Might hold off checking this out if that’s the case.

          • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            20 hours ago

            For clarification, Organic Maps was the project that has been accused of mismanagement. A significant portion of that community departed to create this app, CoMaps. The goal from the outset was to create a more transparent and open community, hence the name, community maps or CoMaps.

            CoMaps is a fairly recent fork of what was already an excellent app, but likely with poor management ethics behind it. I’ve been extremely impressed by the rapid pace of development on a pretty sizable project. There are already hundreds of small (and a few not so small) improvements over the project it was forked from.

        • Harry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          sigh

          Sake. Can every bloody FOSS project stop falling out with itself and fighting with each other?

  • hellmo_luciferrari@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I see it supports Android Auto. Does anyone know if its only the google play store version that supports Android auto?

  • astro@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Asking out of pure confusion and not at all out of snark, but what is the purpose of the app? A reskin of osm? What features does it add beyond those found in Osmand~?

    • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I use OSMand more for car navigation or hiking navigation, CoMaps for me is more for finding out about a store, or a coffeeplace in the city somewhere… the search is somehow just miles ahead of OSMand (which almost never satisfies me) and the UI decisions just seem better for that. It also looks fantastic, although OSMand is highly customizable and for car navigation i’m really happy with the map settings i have.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s a very different approach. Personally, I could never fit OSMand into my daily routine, but this one has been great.

      It’s not a reskin, it’s built from the ground up. Although it is technically a fork of a fork (not OSMand).

      For me, much more user-friendly and intuitive and even quicker. They both use open street maps data, but I think they are worlds apart. I haven’t done any testing with OSMand for a couple years, so I couldn’t tell you which specific features are different.

      I find it very easy to read, day or night. It’s quick to add a destination for navigation. It’s very easy to create updates directly from the app that will upload to OSM.

    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Osmand~ and CoMaps (fork of Organic Maps) use the same map data, but different rendering/routing engines.

      Osmand~ is everything and the kitchen sink. Any feature you can think of, it probably has

      CoMaps is just the basics for 85% of people. It’s much simpler, its map drawing is much faster (no lag while waiting for tiles/branches/labels like Osmand), and much faster on-device routing than Osmand.