Bad news then: almost all software engineers will be using various forms of genAI for their work, let that be LLMs for coding or image generation for quickly visualising things.
It’s a logical conclusion of the present situation. No one will pay for grass or asphalt textures, when genai can produce more variety than any human asset artist ever could. In coding it’s a more complicated situation, but for certain tasks it’s almost dumb not to use ai. Even of you don’t use it to actually write code it’s still helpful to a varying degree.
I won’t buy slop.
If it’s made with GenAI it shouldn’t be copyrighted if nothing else.
if it’s made with GenAI, they can sell it to llms and bots.
I’m in the market for games by humans, for humans.
Exactly, especially if its been trained on copyrighted stuff.
Bad news then: almost all software engineers will be using various forms of genAI for their work, let that be LLMs for coding or image generation for quickly visualising things.
Yeah I guess some people with no moral backbone will do that
any source for that?
It’s a logical conclusion of the present situation. No one will pay for grass or asphalt textures, when genai can produce more variety than any human asset artist ever could. In coding it’s a more complicated situation, but for certain tasks it’s almost dumb not to use ai. Even of you don’t use it to actually write code it’s still helpful to a varying degree.
Ok so no source, just a feeling. Hey, nothing wrong with that, just don’t present it as a fact.
they’re certainly welcome to do so.
I will not buy.