• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s really not, at least for any country with industries that can’t stand up to goods that have been produced at what is essentially a major loss… in a country with already nearly non-existent labor costs.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Labour costs in China are not that low these days, that’s kind of the point of the subsidies. It’s also much more competitive to subsidise domestic production than to tariff imports. Without that, it just means that Americans pay more for the Chinese goods they’re going to buy anyway because they don’t have a domestic alternative. If the revenue from tariffs in America were actually used to improve manufacturing capacity it wouldn’t be such a problem.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Since when does the US not have an auto industry? That’s the biggest one being protected with tariffs, same story in EU.

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          the auto industry relies on Chinese imports for much of its materials, without extra investment only applying tariffs will hurt it too