I want to read you two recent headlines from New York magazine. They were written within a week of each other. The first is “A.O.C. Is Just a Regular Old Democrat Now,” and that accuses you of compromising on your progressive ideals as you work within the party system. And then came the rebuttal, which was “The ‘A.O.C. Left’ Has Achieved Plenty,” which argued that your wing has pushed the party leftward. Why do you think your role is still being parsed this way by Democrats and by those on the left?

Part of it is because we haven’t really had a political presence like this in the United States before. I think very often you had this consummate insider that was bankrolled by corporate money and advancing this, frankly, very neoliberal agenda. And those were the people that we were used to seeing in power. And so I think over time there’s been an inherent association between power, ascent and quote-unquote selling out.

I often say to my grass-roots companions that the left, for a very long time, was not used to having power in the United States. And so when we encounter power, we’re so bewildered by it —

Yes, the reason we are suspicious of you is because we’re too fucking stupid to understand. Thank you boss queen!!!

Moving your ideas internationally, even if they might conflict with the foreign policy of the leader of your own party?

I wouldn’t necessarily characterize my foreign policy goals as oppositional to the president’s or to the United States. I am a member of Congress. I have sworn an oath to this country, and I take that oath very seriously.

That says it all, doesn’t it?

Do you feel more comfortable in the Democratic Party now? The way you described it initially was fraught. They rejected you, and you were definitely trying to change the party. You have said you’ve pushed the party leftward. Many would agree. So is it OK to be a regular Democrat now?

The activist in me always seeks to agitate for more. I think despite there being progress, many people are still woefully underserved in this country. But the Democratic Party has changed dramatically in the last five years. Even if you just look at the numbers, I believe it’s something around 50 percent of House Democrats have been elected since 2018. And so what is considered center and moderate now is dramatically different than what it was five years ago.

No no wait, that says it all.

Being center and moderate is good now folks!

  • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey, if AOC is the new center I think that’s progress. As long as we can continue to elect people further to the left we’ll be able to continue to shift the party to a better place.

      • UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s hard to see someone moving a few feet when you’re a mile away from them. It sounds like you wanted a revolutionary which AOC has never been.

      • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        She hasn’t changed much at all, she was never a socialist. She and Bernie, despite what they call themselves, are Social Democrats. They are left leaning capitalists, which I say is better than the moderate Dems like Pelosi. In the same way that capitalism was an improvement on the feudalism before it.