• rgb3x3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, that may be better. At least it doesn’t use water and it would be fine in a very dry environment out western US.

      Native plants would still be even better though.

    • Snowman44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I live in the desert (Utah). My yard will look like this soon. It’s too expensive to water our lawn so we’re going with a xeriscape.

    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looks like an example of xeriscaping, or gardening with a minimal need for irrigation. Not the best I’ve seen, but at least it’s water-conserving.

      • kbotc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is the native landscape a rock garden? If you live in the Mojave: Go nuts, but that black rock is going to bake your house and drive up your carbon dioxide usage. Plants breathe just like animals do and that increases humidity locally, and in dry climates that can be a significant cooling effect. Essentially cheap evaporative cooling.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel like this can still be a native lawn depending on which biome it’s in. Seems more desert like than a prairie/forest type “native lawn” you might traditionally think of.

      But yeah native can look different depending on location so I might be ok with this