Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoWired has retracted its article "How Google alters search queries"www.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up1385arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.worldgoogle@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1380arrow-down1external-linkWired has retracted its article "How Google alters search queries"www.wired.comSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square111fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.worldgoogle@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squarecircuscritic@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-21 year agoThey haven’t been. Google’s lawyers moved to restrict trial documents from being made public, and the judge agreed to. Only a handful were briefly available prior to that ruling. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/26/technology/google-antitrust-trial-secrecy.html https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/29/google-antitrust-trial-limited-public-access https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/09/google-exec-said-users-get-hooked-on-search-engine-like-cigarettes-or-drugs/
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI see, I missed that they managed to get the lawsuit back under wraps. Still, I find it highly unlikely that the article was revoked under threat.
They haven’t been. Google’s lawyers moved to restrict trial documents from being made public, and the judge agreed to. Only a handful were briefly available prior to that ruling.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/26/technology/google-antitrust-trial-secrecy.html
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/29/google-antitrust-trial-limited-public-access
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/09/google-exec-said-users-get-hooked-on-search-engine-like-cigarettes-or-drugs/
I see, I missed that they managed to get the lawsuit back under wraps.
Still, I find it highly unlikely that the article was revoked under threat.