• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    The thing about that is there never was an era where war crimes were punished consistently.

    • rammer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      In fact the modern post-WW2 era is about as good as it gets. And that is indeed not much.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think generally it’s more akin to your average legal proceedings. The plebs who commit war crimes will face the full extent of the law, but when wealthy entities or nations do it they will often get away with it.

          When it comes to charging the losers, even with the Nazis and the Nuremburg trials there was a significant amount of opposition from people within the Allied nations against prosecuting them. Actually, in an article about Ben Ferencz (the guy who worked hardest to make the Nuremburg trials happen) I read about a Nazi tried in the UK, Winston Churchill personally donated towards this Nazi’s defense and then had his execution commuted down to life, then later only ~20 years. By the end of the war Churchill was vehemently against the Soviets and chomping at the bit to invade them, I think this gave him sympathy towards Nazis who had been fighting Soviets. I’ve since been unable to find the guy’s name, though.