• qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, between the telemetry data collection, the strange hardware requirements, advertisements, bloatware, and unknown future licensing model, Linux is looking like an attractive option. At this point, I only use Windows for Office and gaming, and Linux + Proton has gotten really good lately. I don’t see a reason to use Windows on my personal machine any more.

    • sweetchildintime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Linux is fine for people like you and me who are comfortable installing our own operating system, and trouble-shooting any problems. Most ‘normal’ people though will continue to walk into a store, buy a laptop, and use whatever came installed.

      Of course, the year of Linux on the desktop actually happened some time ago without anyone noticing. It’s called ChromeOS, and that’s a whole different can of worms.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        While true, how much troubleshooting does windows require? Because as I sometimes use windows, it’s not that much less work to get it to do what you want it to do, or solve issues, than linux.

        Especially since it feels like windows tries to fight you every step of the way.

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most distributions require little to no troubleshooting, and if they do, someone has probably already posted the solution online. It’s pretty rare these days that you run into a problem that someone else hasn’t and you’re stuck figuring it out yourself.

          The only pain point is trying to find the Linux equivalent of the Windows apps that you commonly use. Web browsers are the exact same, but that’s about it. A fair amount of apps to offer Linux counterparts though.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          When windows needs fixing, people take it to the best buy genius bar or whatever

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It depends on ehat youre trying to do. If you are teying to debloat it, of course you go out of your way, but it has the reverse problem for most drivers, where youre almost guaranteed to plug in an arbitrary USB device, and itll probably have drivers or software in the windows environment.

          Linux is great. With the caveat that you specifically pick hardware that works well in Linux for it, else you have the problem of “a choice fighting you every step of the way”

        • CeeBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          While true, how much troubleshooting does windows require?

          A surprising amount

        • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Linux is easily fixed but the problem is that the issues that crop up needing to be fixed are generally not pain points on Windows. The first Arch install I did this year was busted and I thought I had broken my networking setup because it wouldn’t connect, but the issue was that the system clock was wrong. Something like that may pop up in Windows but you can quickly press the sync time and date button in the settings and it’ll sort itself out, while Arch requires a lot more work than just that, especially if it has no connectivity.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            …I’ve certainly had that issue on windows as well. I had to manually set the time. Windows sync at least didn’t use to always work.

          • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve been using Linux for like 15 years and Arch for about a decade. I’ve never had an issue where the system time prevents the network connection from working. That’s odd.

            • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It makes sense because all of our cryptography is based around time limits. If the system time is way off it can’t verify the cryptographic signatures and it’s not going to validate any certs since the time doesn’t line up properly.

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Once people get over the initial Windows indoctrination, Linux is simple to use and doesn’t require tons of complex troubleshooting like people think. Before the COVID lockdown I tried for the Nth time to get my dad to use Linux. I had it installed and told him to stick with it for a few weeks (he only browses the web and plays solitaire). If he still didn’t like it, I’d reenable Windows. Well that few weeks turned into 6 months. Now both he and my mom have been happy Linux users for about 2 years.

        • itsraining@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I may ask, how do you deal with updates? Have you enabled unattended upgrades or do you update the machines yourself?

          • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            His dad just needs to put a password when asked. It’s a 6-years-old kid task updating on most Linux distro.

            • itsraining@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              That would be true if:

              1. A GUI software center is used (or if the said dad is comfortable with an interactive console application)
              2. The said dad actually realizes the importance behind updates. From my experience, many people don’t.

              So, unless both of above are true, the dad will never (want to) update his system because “it works as is”, sticking to old versions of software, never receiving bugfixes and neglecting security.

              • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Most distro nowadays come with a gui to update. A pop up window appears asking if you want to update/upgrade. You can press “yes” and the password of the sudoer or admin user is asked. It has been like this for over a decade. For popular distros as Ubuntu or fedora over 15 years

                Is it different for your distro?

                • itsraining@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, probably because I stick with Arch and Slackware plus a lightweight environment. The only time I saw such a GUI was when I tried out Elementary just for fun.

                  What I consider a problem is that the user can simply dismiss or disregard the updates notification indefinitely. I know many non-tech-savvy people who do not understand the importance of updates, so they would be inclined to do exactly that. That is why unattended upgrades are probably a better option in such cases.

              • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re a wise (wo)man. That is exactly the case. I’ve shown him how to do it in the GUI but he doesn’t care to because, like you said, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.

                • itsraining@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Thank you for answering. I can relate to manually updating my parents’ systems once in a while but at this point I’m seriously considering unattended upgrades (updating over SSH is also a good idea).

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not the guy you asked, and I hope he responds because I’d like to hear his answer too, but a lot of that depends on the Linux distro you select. On rolling releases you get continuous updates automatically, not major upgrades like forced Windows Updates.

            • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m OP, he runs Manjaro and I handle the updates whenever I see him, every month or so (I live out of state). I could do it over SSH but if something happens to break, it’s a pain to fix. I showed him how to do it in the GUI but he doesn’t care to do it.

            • itsraining@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What do you mean, automatically? Arch is a rolling release and I have to explicitly run pacman with the correct flags to update. At the same time Debian, which is not a rolling release, has the unattended upgrades feature which installs updates automatically.

              But indeed, many things depend on the distro. For example, user-centric distros such as Elementary and others provide an easy to use GUI for updating the system.

              And yes, Windows Updates was (is still? not a Win user) a nightmare.

              • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What do you mean, automatically? Arch is a rolling release and I have to explicitly run pacman with the correct flags to update. At the same time Debian, which is not a rolling release, has the unattended upgrades feature which installs updates automatically.

                I was thinking Tumbleweed, Manjaro and the like which have GUI updaters, lol. @pete_the_cat@lemmy.world was pretty clear that his parents are the ultimate Linux beginners; he’s not going to give them Arch or Debian out of the box and bark command lines at them.

          • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do it for them whenever I come over every month or two (I live out of state). I could also just SSH in and do it remotely if I really wanted to. I showed my dad how to do it with the GUI package manager, but he’s the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” type. Linux will run perfectly fine without updates for years.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        When people are talking about Linux Desktop they usually mean GNU/Linux. Chrome OS and Android both use the Linux kernel, but they aren’t GNU/Linux like we understand Linux desktop.

        GNU/Linux needs a company that will create a Macintosh equivalent. A company that will design quality hardware. Restrict the hardware they support tightly, but highly optimise the drivers in their devices. Selling their equipment with a distro that’s well supported with bug testing and user support. Each update being tested on all their devices.

        This would allow people to buy their devices without much thought.

        I think people in the past thought this could be Ubuntu and Canonical. But their business is server, so there desktop will never get to the place it needs to be.

        The steam deck is pushing Linux closer to this place. But I don’t think it will be enough.

          • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            System76 aren’t there. They sell rebranded ugly generic laptops with low quality screens. They sell them for a similar prices to low end macbooks. You put the average person in front of both in a store and they are going for the macbook. Better screen, better battery life and good quality hardware.

            PopOS has the best chance to be ‘the Linux’ desktop. But they need nicer hardware. System76 are selling laptops to Linux people, that’s their market. They don’t have nice hardware design to compete in the high end of the market. And they aren’t cheap enough to compete in the low end.

            System76 are also going after the server market. I suspect they will go the way of Ubuntu. Chasing the server market and being too distracted to follow through with their desktop ambitions.

            • hperrin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Tell us how you really feel. xD

              I wouldn’t call System76’ hardware ugly. It’s generic looking, sure, but it’s not ugly. It’s also designed by them. They used to only customize OEM systems with their own designs, but they started designing and manufacturing their own desktops a few years ago. Their first fully self designed and manufactured laptop is coming out soon. They have never just rebranded other companies’ designs though, so that’s just flat out wrong.

              Their screens are fine. Have you seen them? They’re nothing to write home about, but they’re not low quality.

              They have a range of laptops from $999 to $3,299, so I’m not sure what you mean when you say they’re a similar price to a low end MacBook.

              They are very much not abandoning their desktop ambitions. They are putting a lot of effort and investment into their own desktop environment.

              There is no company that designs all their PC hardware and all their software. Not even Apple does (but they’re probably the closest). Everyone has suppliers they work with for stuff they don’t want to design or build.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To add to that, Android is likely the overwhelming market share of Linux-based operating systems in use today. For that matter, an absolute ton of Intel CPUs have Minux installed on them too, but I wouldn’t call this “on the desktop”, just interesting.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Until you realize that many orgs have software that only works on windows.

      Its not a great situation

      • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Storage is super cheap these days. Just buy an extra hard drive for Windows and boot into that on the rare occasion you truly need to use Windows. Or just use a VM.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Corporations have access to a version of windows that doesn’t have telemetry, advertisements or bloatware. Its called Enterprise Edition.

          • ramble81@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cost wasn’t mentioned in the original scope. OP was saying he hates the telemetry, ads, etc. and then you stated that companies have software that needs windows to run, to which I stated that there is a version that doesn’t have OPs concerns and runs custom apps that companies use.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve worked as a SWE at Facebook, Google, and LinkedIn, and none of the devs I worked with used Windows. Everyone either used Mac or Linux. It’s just a matter of time before the dev world bleeds out into the consumer world.

    • corbin@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The subscription rumor was debunked pretty quickly. I honestly don’t see that happening anytime soon, PC makers would get pretty upset (especially if they don’t get a cut of the revenue).

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do it. I only use Windows to play my heavily modded copy of Skyrim and now Starfield. Everything else has been Linux for years.

      • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was using Mint for a while but the system got hosed. I plan on modding Starfield, and there was another game I can’t recall that wouldn’t work on Linux. After I best Starfield I fully expect to wipe my system again and go with a more stable distro of Linux (e.g. Gentoo or something).

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They work fine unmodded (AFAIK) it’s just a pain getting them to work through MO2 along with other things.

      • twack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have been playing both of those on proton with little issue, and I’m not positive that the issues I experienced are exclusive to linux.

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Using ModOrganizer2 to launch a Windows game from Steam using Proton is a massive pain in the ass, I’ve tried to set it up a few times before. I finally got it to work correctly, where it would actually run the game with ENB, and I was getting 15 FPS on an RTX 2080 Super and Ryzen 7 5900.

          Also trying to get all the other programs like DynDoLOD and xEdit to work with MO2 was a pain as well.

  • a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I could probably tolerate Windows 11 if:

    • the start menu search didn’t search the web and just searched my system.
    • the widget panel wasn’t just a wrapper for their shitty news aggregator that seems to only gather celebrity news
    • If I have windows pro, I don’t want notifications to use Edge or see TikTok, Amazon, Candycrush, etc. in the start menu (I know they aren’t downloaded but what “pro” wants any of that shit)
    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      the start menu search didn’t search the web and just searched my system.

      Windows 10 has the same problem, that one isn’t unique to 11.

      Widgets I don’t think there’s anything that can save that. 10% of the space is set aside for actual widgets, the rest is just their “news”.

    • Neeen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used a regedit to fix the web search part of it. Starallback is what I use to fix the rest of it. After that, it’s almost like I’m using Windows 10.

      Changing audio output does still take an extra click compared to before, but I’ve just been dealing with that.

    • HidingCat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Searching the web isn’t that bad, it’s on the bottom anyway, no? Or did they change that in Win11?

      Still waiting for my taskbar changes, mainly.

      • a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is definitely a personal preference thing but I think if you want to search the web, you go to the web browser. And if you want to search for a folder or file on the system, windows search should fulfill that purpose.

        At the very least, it should be a toggle. The current implementation of Windows search feels like it’s only there to force people to use Edge

  • kubica@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can understand that sometimes hardware needs to be deprecated, but windows 11 is trying to ditch hardware that is still quite new. And with all the chip problems and expenses it has not been so feasible to “just” get something more up to date.

    If I’m going to buy something with the same money that I bought what I have now I’m going to end with about the same pefromance of what I have.

    • tobbue@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah the hardware I’m running can easily run cyberpunk and any other modern game with satisfying FPS. Yet, it has no 8th gen CPU so I’m not able to upgrade. If I would upgrade my CPU just for win 11 I would have to replace my mainboard and then my GPU would bottleneck which would be, well, sad, so I would feel like I need to upgrade it too … And well, we know where this leads. I’m just not in for this ride just for Windows 11. I already use Linux on a different drive and prepare to fully switch to Linux. It’s just for gaming that I still use Windows and I feel like Linux could really “profit” from Microsofts decision to ditch Windows 10 under this conditions.

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. I can literally buy brand new hardware that doesn’t run Windows 11 without an extra purchase (TPM module).

  • HidingCat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    ITT: People who just read the headlines and not the article, and then going off on their own Windows rant/Linux evangelism instead of discussing the article.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hardly ever saw Linux evangelism on Reddit. It’s honestly becoming about on par with veganism at this point… And that’s coming from someone that uses and enjoys Linux.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read the article! It suggests in a hundred different ways that Windows 11 sucks and that sticking it out with Windows 10 is a bad idea for a dozen different reasons.

      The people here suggesting Linux nailed it. If you’re not using Linux at this point you’re just being lazy, IMHO. If you have any issues you can always just troubleshoot and fix it but based on the anecdotes posted so far it’s obvious no one claiming to have tried Linux has done much of that.

      Get off your ass and learn something new for real or stop bitching and bend over for Microsoft with your wallet ready to pay them afterwards for the privilege.

      People bitching about Windows on their personal PCs is like people who don’t vote bitching about politics.

      • HidingCat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I just want to use my time in other ways, thank you. You can call it lazy, but that’s what it is. Windows 10 still works, the issues won’t come till 2025, and regardless, Windows 11 issues are mostly personal preferences (I just want my task bar to work in a certain way).

        This religious-like evangelising over Linux is such a turn off, regardless of whatever technical merits the OS might have. It’s definitely not moving the needle for me, and it’s turning me off the fediverse.

        • Zammy95@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Linux has tons of perks! If you don’t care, awesome! Have a nice day and enjoy whatever you want.

          I don’t see how this is a difficult concept for so many haha. Like yeah, you can like something and think it’s a better way to do something, but I do LOADS of things the “wrong way”. Who cares

          • HidingCat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s why the Linux crowd here I describe as evangelical. I’m going to say that even the vegans aren’t as annoyingly zealous.

      • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Every half a decade or so since windows 95 I have tried Linux and I have come to the same conclusion each time. I rather use windows 95.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it’s not gaming I’m dual booting into Linux as my primary productivity OS. Even then, a lot of the games I play do run perfectly fine under Linux. Been going strong with this since 2015 and I don’t have much negative to say about it. Ymmv

          • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Only place it works fine for me is steam deck. Otherwise I just use windows unless I have to service a Linux machine at work.

      • corbin@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Linux is great but it’s not always an option. It doesn’t run every app or game that Windows has (Proton is great but it’s not 100%), or maybe you’re doing dev work that has to be on a Windows machine, or you’re using some hardware that isn’t supported well in Linux. I switched off Linux to Windows (and then later to macOS) partially because Photoshop and Lightroom are pretty great tools for my job and the workarounds/alternatives weren’t cutting it.

        • hperrin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s funny cause the last time I told my friend Alex that I couldn’t switch to Windows because it doesn’t run the Linux apps I need, he was like, “well you can use WSL, which can run Linux apps in Windows”. I would describe it the same way, it’s great, but it’s not 100%.

      • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Putting this burden straight on the consumer is stupid. Most people don’t care about what’s running on their machines and have absolutely no interest in learning it. Same thing with cars, you know how to operate it and that’s enough for 95% of the people. I agree that Linux is not that hard to learn and understand but that’s already too much for the standard consumer.

        The issue is and has always been with Microsoft and the deals it had with OEM and governments. It locked us into a Microsoft only world (office being absolutely everywhere, windows installed by default on 99% of hardware etc.), and things that were unveiled by the Halloween Papers etc… Microsoft changed its stance on FOSS but it’s only because they managed to profit from it (azure mostly). It’s still the same garbage company.

      • massivefailure@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you’re not using Linux at this point you’re just being lazy

        I used Linux for over twenty years and stopped about two years ago due to Linux invariably moving to lazy, poor development and design all the way from the kernel up. Rapid kernel development with tons of random new patches and ideas instead of the old way of maintaining a stable kernel and doing random patches and ideas on a separate branch (the odd minor versions vs. the stable even ones, and even the modern “stable” kernels are just the same branch of constantly rapid updated kernels where they just choose one at random and say “this is ‘stable’ now and we’ll keep patching it instead of telling people to install new ones”), systemd being more of a problem than a solution, the push for everything to move to Wayland forcing every single thing that has to do with lower level desktop interfaces, including all of the lightweight window managers, to completely rewrite themselves with tons of bloat that replaces everything X.org did by default as well as Wayland’s devs taking a “it works on my computer” approach to bugs and dismissing tons of major issues people have found, pipewire still not being a stable, reliable audio system (Linux has never had one, but using ALSA with the right hardware back in the day where everything would mix via hardware was a decent solution), distros becoming more and more unreliable and buggy (even “stable” and “long term support” ones), distros and developers giving up on native and running bare metal applications and substituting things like flatpak to run things natively with any sort of cross-platform reliability and fucking wine – essentially a new version of Windows running in Linux, which is an admission of failure to make a successful game platform if I’ve ever heard one – to run games, and on and on.

        I’ve been able to use Linux very well until a few years back. I used to be one of its biggest advocates and wouldn’t dare run Windows.

        No more. People bitch, moan, and complain about Windows 11 so much but for me, it just works. Simply, easily, no problem. Do I wish I still used Linux? Hell, yes. But am I given how bad it’s become? Nope. I’ve even tried going back here and there and quickly ran into the same huge list of problems and aches that were never there before and back to Windows I go.

        Sorry, Linux is a pain and it’s not about being lazy, it’s about wanting to use a decent OS that just works as well as Linux used to.

        • hperrin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been using Linux since 2008, and yours and my experience is basically opposite. I stayed on X until about a year ago, and haven’t had any problems with Wayland. PipeWire was basically immediately better as soon as Fedora switched to it. I could use Jack plugins and patch bays with my pulse apps, including all the electron apps, like Discord. Systemd has always been better than sys5 init. Maybe you don’t remember how bad the old init daemon was.

          I’m sorry you had trouble with Linux though.

          • massivefailure@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I remember the old initd. It was fast, efficient, didn’t hang up for 10+ minutes when it got confused about what needed to shut down when, and just worked until a bunch of impatient new Linux users wanted to get to the desktop in 0.00007 seconds and couldn’t patiently wait for a proper init boot order so they created this bloated monstrosity. But those aren’t even the worst part of NuLinux: to this day Wayland is absolute unstable garbage not worth using. Visual glitches, UI glitches, instability, slowdowns, and outright crashes that even REISUB can’t recover from. Meanwhile, Xorg still Just Works.

            Modern Linux is garbage and needs to be either fixed or thrown away.

  • nabladabla@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They used to say that 10 would be the last version and they’d just update that

  • Sprite@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I swear I’m not a Linux snob, but Linux is legitimely better for the average user than Windows. If you just need to use a browser, as MANY people do, Linux is more lenient on hardware and doesn’t lock you into an update screen of helplessness. I highly recommend ZorinOS, it has an option specifically for older machines.

    • HC4L@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry but I hate this argument. Most people use a phone for that anyway. And my 70 year old mom is going to ask my dad and if he can’t fix the problem someone else and guess what. They never worked with Linux. I can tell you that a lot of the buttons and controls have looked the same in Windows for way too long. Admittedly from Windows 10/11 this gets worse.

      Also they will need software from the local photo place, some shit old legacy app that they refuse to let go, banking software that isn’t Linux compatible… it’s never “just browsing” from my experience and it’s not worth the hassle. Especially if I’m cornering myself by becoming the only 24/7 on-call admin for my family.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I switched my mom to Linux back in 2014, and she hasn’t had problems with it (except every 2 years when she makes me update her to the new version of Ubuntu, because she doesn’t want to do it herself). My dad has tried to switch her back to Windows, but she likes Ubuntu better. He eventually switched too after he retired and we built him a computer. He uses it for browser+light gaming, and Linux works well for both now. (He was familiar with Linux as part of his job, so it wasn’t hard for him to get used to the switch. Though he was really only familiar with the terminal.)

    • generally would have agreed with you but since i got a new Monitor i have had nothing but Problems.

      Granted i don’t make it Easy for Linux by having 3 monitors at 4K:60Hz 1440p:144Hz 1080p:60Hz but still

      all my Browsers always crash. I assume it has to do with Scaling since they like to especially crash when i move them between monitors. Then Gnome randomly crashes. It’s a nightmare.

      was forced to come back to Windows 11 because of all that Bullshit. I guess the upside is much better Security on Windows, but still. Although that added Security is pretty useless since every fucking Program needs administrator rights for some inconceivable reason.

      • Sprite@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t use Gnome, as I had other issues with it. I solely use KDE with Wayland on endeavourOS (so Arch). I have multi monitor issues on W10 at work and I’m waiting to upgrade to W11. I’d request Linux, but due to the project I cannot. I’ve heard plenty of bad stuff about Gnome crashing for people and had it crash for me as well. I’d recommend giving KDE a try if you aren’t too tired of trying, but I respect your choice of W11. Most people don’t have multiple screens though. I don’t recommend Linux to niche users, since they may have niche needs.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s easier than ever to switch to Linux, especially if the thing holding you back was gaming.

  • doleo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t need to read this article to know that the Taskbar Calendar/Agenda Flyout is still missing.

  • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    guess who’s jumping ship as soon as win10 acts up again? i’m not gonna pay a win11 subscription.

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You mean going off reading the title of a post on Lemmy and not actually looking into it?

        • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The AI integration certainly will be: Microsoft’s not giving away ongoing AI computation for a one-time purchase of the OS, even though it will be integrated with the Windows 11 OS as soon as the fall upgrades get forced down.

          Right now Copilot is free, but that’s only until enough people start using it and then they’ll paywall it.

          Note that Copilot uses the Office 365 framework (Microsoft’s subscription model) which should tell people all they need to know about how free Microsoft intends to keep it.

  • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Windows 11 soon gets more AI integration. Scanning all your files and content of files, this is no conspiracy. Deleting your Microsoft account if it detects misbehavior, even if you never shared this private info with anyone. You’ll also not be able to program anything you want anymore, because if the AI detects it’s possibly malicious, it will delete your Microsoft account.

    It’s probably a lot of fun if you have stuff on your onedrive or use outlook.

    Why is there so little outrage about this? I hope it doesn’t release for win10 or is blockable.

    Edit: first is German though https://tarnkappe.info/artikel/netzpolitik/microsofts-neuer-servicevertrag-erlaubt-totalueberwachung-aller-nutzer-280856.html

    https://www.microsoft.com/de-de/servicesagreement/default.aspx

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/DigitalSafety/moderation-and-enforcement/content-detection

    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna

    • corbin@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have not seen anything about Microsoft accounts getting deleted for AI falsely identifying something as malicious. Windows Defender and OneDrive do scan your files for malware, yeah.

        • corbin@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those links just say that illegal content uploaded to Microsoft services might get your account suspended, which is how pretty much every online service works. There’s a higher bar than “misbehavior”.

            • corbin@infosec.pubOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a video editorializing the article that was already editorializing the Microsoft support pages. That’s just a game of telephone with everyone in the process trying to make it sound scarier than it actually is.

              • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you added your Microsoft account to your windows, then you use their services and therefore agree to the new SLAs, to do whatever they please. It’s vague on purpose, to give them maximum freedom to do so. That they scan your uploads is nothing new.

                • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’re just saying how most TOA’s are…they’re hardly ever enforced that way, just because of the publicity it would give them. And most TOA’s aren’t even legally binding and this is definitely something that would face litigation.

                  If your issue with it is the vagueness, you might as well get off the grid now. Most TOA’s are written that way.

            • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No subtitles available for this video.

              Besides your links are too generic, if you want to properly demonstrate your theory you will need to at least quote the relevant part and especially the parts about AI.

              • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I don’t know anymore. Maybe the author of the video is wrong and the 1000 comments as well. I personally see it on Microsoft to be more clear. They got to be more precise, else you have enough room to do whatever you please. Scanning content can always get extended to other means. First it’s for a legit reason like protection children but later they extend it. Giving them options to do that, isn’t good.