• akrz@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is only if you opted into research. And I am actually happy this is happening. If only one person is helped by research outcomes or medications developed from this, I am happy. I don’t care if 23andMe gets rich from it or not.

  • Devi@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are getting very confused here. You can allow your anonymised data to be used for research. This is not new whatsoever and it’s done by consent.

    What IS new is that a company (GSK) are about to start using this data. Data that’s publicly used already. This may help them to develop some new treatments.

    • interolivary@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No no, just repeat after me: “I can say I tOlD YoU So!” You don’t want to be caught using anything resembling logic when it comes to pharmaceutical companies.

  • memfree@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    H-h-how? HOW? do they ‘anonymize’ DNA?!?! Remember how in 2007 ‘anonymized’ netflix data was linked back to actual members? That was just checking what people watched on Netflix compared to what they rated on IMDB.

    With DNA, you should be able to figure out who someone is by the fact you an exact DNA record! I mean, it’ll share similarities with your parents, and children, and to a lesser degree, more removed relatives. How hard can it be to figure out that this woman is related to that guy with an arrest record. Or more specifically: this is the exact person because we see other records from any doctor or whatever with the same DNA.

    • Victor Villas@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      H-h-how? HOW? do they ‘anonymize’ DNA?!?!

      If you really curious, it is possible depending on the sections of the DNA being shared and how aggregated they are. Not saying that this will be the case - it’s quite likely that this sale would be done prioritizing value instead of privacy - but it is possible. The key part is to not treat the whole DNA as a data sample, but specific sequence sections, as isolated as possible.

      And the Netflix example is instructive but not super relevant here. If you already have your SNPs in a public database out there, then yeah 23andMe might not be able to effectively anonymize your samples; but you don’t (I hope).

      • sudoshakes@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        All prisoners in the US, regardless of infraction, have DNA samples taken in many states.

        That is not voluntary.

        It was ruled constitutional by SCOTUS.

        If you had that done, and you have family dumb enough to use 23andme, then you just got screwed, involuntarily, twice.