• rdri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    a 280 page report / an article with no substance

    There is something wrong with the subject if it needs those for anyone to understand the bad nature. You don’t need that with terrorism. Hamas kills -> people die -> hamas must be stopped.

    The main radicalizing factor isn’t TV

    Then how come it needs to be about how everyone should kill jews?

    while Israel propagandizes its civilians and forces most of them into either jail or military service when they reach military age

    An army is very different from what terrorists do.

    They also put military infrastructure in crowded civilian areas just like Hamas.

    Well they also put meaningful effort into protecting all of that. I wouldn’t imagine anyone would do that otherwise.

    Ukraine set up bases in civilian areas, including schools. But we still consider Russia the bad guys, for obvious reasons.

    Is that sarcasm? Do I need to explain how Russia knowingly bombs non-military targets with no military personnel?

    They literally did. How do you think Hamas got elected over Fatah.

    It was mentioned (here too I think) that those elections were not exactly what you’d expect from proper elections, and yet you want to use this as an argument…

    Straight from the wikipedia page

    Well look at how things changed. What was the moment hamas decided to go full terrorist and spend resources on arming up, and how did Palestinians feel about that?

    Hamas literally has in its charter that it is willing to accept a 2 state solution on the 1967 lines, so yes it would absolutely be willing to negotiate.

    Straight from the wikipedia page:

    • Destroying Israel and establishing an Islamic theocracy in Palestine is essential;
    • Negotiated resolutions of Jewish and Palestinian claims to the land are unacceptable.