For a long time Firefox Desktop development has supported both Mercurial and Git users. This dual SCM requirement places a significant burden on teams which are already stretched thin in parts. We have made the decision to move Firefox development to Git.

  • We will continue to use Bugzilla, moz-phab, Phabricator, and Lando
  • Although we’ll be hosting the repository on GitHub, our contribution workflow will remain unchanged and we will not be accepting Pull Requests at this time
  • We’re still working through the planning stages, but we’re expecting at least six months before the migration begins

APPROACH

In order to deliver gains into the hands of our engineers as early as possible, the work will be split into two components: developer-facing first, followed by piecemeal migration of backend infrastructure.

Phase One - Developer Facing

We’ll switch the primary repository from Mercurial to Git, at the same time removing support for Mercurial on developers’ workstations. At this point you’ll need to use Git locally, and will continue to use moz-phab to submit patches for review.

All changes will land on the Git repository, which will be unidirectionally synchronised into our existing Mercurial infrastructure.

Phase Two - Infrastructure

Respective teams will work on migrating infrastructure that sits atop Mercurial to Git. This will happen in an incremental manner rather than all at once.

By the end of this phase we will have completely removed support of Mercurial from our infrastructure.

    • ToRA@lemmy.worldEnglish
      238·
      1 year ago

      I agree that PRs are problematic, but that doesn’t make GitHub “trash”.

      Also, that dude is so obnoxious and really seems to like to make broad generalizations of his opinion like it’s fact.

      • Scorpion3869@lemmy.ml
        61·
        1 year ago

        and really seems to like to make broad generalizations of his opinion like it’s fact.

        None of what Brodie said is baseless, even if some are more opinion than fact. He sight’s sources for a reason.

        • ToRA@lemmy.worldEnglish
          42·
          1 year ago

          He sight’s sources for a reason.

          I’d hope so. It wouldn’t be good if they were blind.

          Anyway, I didn’t question the accuracy of what he said, just that his manner of delivery is obnoxious and portrays an attitude of self-importance. It feels like he’s yelling at the viewer with hostility.

          • Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space
            3·
            1 year ago

            Aussies tend to be quite direct. It’s basically our natural state. I get how it can be perceived as hostile, but I don’t actually think Brodie is very abrasive. He seems like a pretty relaxed guy.

          • Scorpion3869@lemmy.ml
            3·
            1 year ago

            He’s literally talking to the viewer the same way the vast majority of YouTubers speak, he’s just Australian.

        • Rustmilian@lemmy.world
          3·
          1 year ago

          Instead of using valid commit messages they just slap on “#42” which isn’t valid anywhere other than the GitHub web UI.

        • IAm_A_Complete_Idiot@sh.itjust.works
          1·
          1 year ago

          Also, GitHub PRs atleast to me feel like they encourage reviewing changes by the total diff of the entire PR, and not each commit. I don’t want a slog of commits that don’t add any value - it just makes doing things like reverts more annoying. Stuff like Gerrit and phabricator enforce reviews by making you review individual commits / changes / whatever you want to call them and not branch diffs.

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      94·
      1 year ago

      … which is part of why they aren’t using GitHubs pull request feature to land changes?

            • Kogasa@programming.dev
              33·
              1 year ago

              I’m only a native English speaker, so guess I could be interpreting it wrong.

              You should try being a native English reader.

              What it means is “they will not be accepting pull requests at this time.” Whether or not they are open to changing this in the future is not specified. They have not specifically stated that this is off the table, nor have they stated this is their intent.