While I would like this kind of crap to stop, I don’t see how you would properly legislate to ban it.
Instead, I think we should look at requiring any changes to software to not be possible to hijack your equipment and remove features.
So if you choose not to update, you can. Currently, they ban you from online play if you don’t. Force them to be backwards compatible and they will. Force the updates to provide user benefit and they will.
Bricking devices, like happens all too often when support ends or a cloud server shuts down should entitle you to a full refund unless they specifically offer it for only a period.
Sony recently with the loss of content. Microsoft with the windows ads. Microsoft with the Xbox ads. Amazon with the ad insertions. We need to combat enshittification in general. Force service portability and force backwards compatibility.
In this case, specifically - banning ads in shit you already paid for. If there’s a subscription fee, then selling your time and attention to someone else cannot possibly be excused with ‘but but but how will they make money? (sad eyes emoji).’ It’s just greed.
Same shit for any gizmo that costs five hundred dollars and still has the unmitigated cheek to call that price ‘subsidized.’ Was that price put on you by a vengeful wizard? No. You chose to lose money. Seems like a stupid move! Not our problem to fix, by being propagandized at, on top of the 30% you make on every game same, and the subscription multiplayer fee.
Control of your hardware is important but not strictly related. Stallman was right. But I don’t need to appeal to software freedom to say, if you pay $200 for an operating system, or $500 for a console, or $120 per year for service, then at the very goddamn least there should be a big obvious button that makes all the ads permanently fuck off.
We’re not likely to shop our way out of something every goddamn company is doing.
Let’s just ban it.
Ban what? Advertising?
While I would like this kind of crap to stop, I don’t see how you would properly legislate to ban it.
Instead, I think we should look at requiring any changes to software to not be possible to hijack your equipment and remove features.
So if you choose not to update, you can. Currently, they ban you from online play if you don’t. Force them to be backwards compatible and they will. Force the updates to provide user benefit and they will.
Bricking devices, like happens all too often when support ends or a cloud server shuts down should entitle you to a full refund unless they specifically offer it for only a period.
Sony recently with the loss of content. Microsoft with the windows ads. Microsoft with the Xbox ads. Amazon with the ad insertions. We need to combat enshittification in general. Force service portability and force backwards compatibility.
Don’t threaten me with a good time.
In this case, specifically - banning ads in shit you already paid for. If there’s a subscription fee, then selling your time and attention to someone else cannot possibly be excused with ‘but but but how will they make money? (sad eyes emoji).’ It’s just greed.
Same shit for any gizmo that costs five hundred dollars and still has the unmitigated cheek to call that price ‘subsidized.’ Was that price put on you by a vengeful wizard? No. You chose to lose money. Seems like a stupid move! Not our problem to fix, by being propagandized at, on top of the 30% you make on every game same, and the subscription multiplayer fee.
Control of your hardware is important but not strictly related. Stallman was right. But I don’t need to appeal to software freedom to say, if you pay $200 for an operating system, or $500 for a console, or $120 per year for service, then at the very goddamn least there should be a big obvious button that makes all the ads permanently fuck off.