Online travel agent allows customers to filter out Boeing 737 Max planes::Kayak customers can exclude Max 9 aircraft after cabin panel blowout on Alaska Airlines flight

  • 13617@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    thought you were serious for a second, for those who aren’t getting the joke, driving your car is thousands of times more dangerous than taking a plane flight

    • ExLisper@linux.community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      But all those articles about Boeing issues will get more people to drive. It’s ironic how fighting for higher flying safety standards can kill people. The surplus in car crash fatalities in the months after 9/11 was higher than the number of passengers on all the planes involved.

      • MrBusiness@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        We need more trains in North America. From my experience between planes, trains, and automobiles (and boats) trains have been the best experience.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m one of those people that likes to get a window seat and occasionally check out the views and marvel at what is really going on at that moment.

          But the flying experience sucks. If there was an option to chill in a comfy train to replace short and medium flights, I would be right there with you.

        • puppy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          “Knocks on wood”. Japan’s bullet trains have zero fatalities after more than 60 years of service. Trains are the absolute safest if managed properly.

        • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’d also be the easiest to make self-driving.

          Don’t want to deal with things like lane changes, identifying traffic signals, erratic drivers, etc? Just focus on self driving trains instead. They go back and forth on a set path, on a set schedule, and can automatically watch for things like people/animals/debris on the tracks, electronically receive stop/go signals, etc…

          All the focus is on self-driving cars, when it really should be on trains.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        It really is insane how many people’s perception of safety is so completely opposite to reality.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Can’t say that I have but it is not really comparable since I would notice random ass fucking bolts in my driveway.

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Ah yes, the location where your car experiences the most movement and vibrations and is most likely to lose a bolt: parked in your driveway. 🤦‍♀️

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I said nothing stupid. Random bolts are not falling off my car. You are the one coming up with excuses for Boeing

                  • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Look. A few incidents happen close together, and everyone loses their damn mind and freaks out, saying they’ll never use those aircraft again, even though 99.999% of the time, it’s one of the safest ways to travel. It’s extremely silly. This shit is a statistical anomaly.

                    At the end of the day, some of their aircraft have been grounded for investigation, and that’s good. This will lead to it being even safer. I hope this also leads to regulatory change, resulting in Boeing no longer being responsible for themselves meeting safety standards.

                    But good lord people freaking out over a handful of incidences that will almost certainly never happen to them are just appealing to irrational fear.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Idk man I see this statistic all the time but you might survive a car crash but if you fall from a metal tube in the sky you are most likely dead as fuck. I think crashes happen lessoften but when you do crash in a plane theres usually zero survivors

        • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ok ok lol I can see why you’d say this so let me frame it another way. I’ve personally been in a car crash before (two), and I survived. Do you know one single person personally yourself who has survived a plane crash? What about two of them? Now what about car crashes? I bet you know at least one person who has survived a car crash, right?

          • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I know more people that have died in car crashes (2, in separate instances, and one person that died in a motorcycle accident) than people who have died in plane crashes (0).

            But that doesn’t actually matter, because a) anecdotal evidence means very little, if not nothing when considering the scale of transportation industries and b) the numbers don’t lie. Since 1970, 85,555 people have died in fatal aviation incidents. Around 100,000 people die or are disabled in car accidents every single month.

            Your misunderstanding of statistics and probability and your idea that because the concept of a minor car accident exists, it nullifies the fact that they are dangerous, is just wrong.

        • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I came back to find this comment. How do you feel about flying now? Make sure it’s not a Boeing amirite?

          • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I am an airframe and powerplant certified mechanic, I worked on 737NGs for years as well as a320/1/neo, etc.

            I know more about aviation than you, I know more about plane crashes than you.

            • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Hey if all that is true then yes you 100 percent do know more than I do about it that’s no question lol just poking at it again because of the news with Boeing killing that guy and the tons of problems they’ve found them to have and they’re still up there zipping around like nothing is happening.

      • puppy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There are stats about fatalities you know? Not just number of incidents. Cars are orders of magnitude more dangerous in those stats as well.