Expert shows how to tamper with Georgia voting machine in election security trial
www.ajc.com
An expert witness for plaintiffs seeking to bar Georgia's touchscreen voting machines showed a crowded courtroom how he could tamper with election results.

Computer scientist shows how to tamper with Georgia voting machine, in election security trial: “All it takes is five seconds and a Bic pen.”::An expert witness for plaintiffs seeking to bar Georgia’s touchscreen voting machines showed a crowded courtroom how he could tamper with election res

  • monk@lemmy.unboiled.infoEnglish
    11·
    6 days ago

    Uh, no. We already have dozens of publicly characterestics to discrinate people against, we can handle one more for a huge benefit of never ever doubting election count results again.

    • stoy@lemmy.zipEnglish
      1·
      6 days ago

      No, just no.

      The moment voter secrecy is gone, you will have a far, far , far worse situation.

      The moment you can verify what a person voted for, then you have opened the door for violence, intimidation and voter bribery.

      The point of voter secrecy is to prevent others from being able to force you to vote on your own.

      Immagine a wife of a MAGA husband, with voter secrecy she would have the option to hide voting for the Democrts, without it she would be able to be forced by her husband to vote for the republicans.

      This is simply because he would be able to verify her vote, with voter secrecy he has to trust her. (Obviously there are ways he still could come close to verifying her vote, but there remains options for her)

      • monk@lemmy.unboiled.infoEnglish
        1·
        5 days ago

        I’m coming from an oppressive dictatorship that kills people for disagreeing with them. One thing to enables them to is voter anonymity. An oppressive MAGA husband example is cute, ofc, but I wasn’t solving “how do we make people vote with there heart is”, this is kinda out of scope and definitely not crucial for a functional democracy, but wishlist-grade at best.

        Now, voter bribery is a good one. Never thought of that and can see how this could be a much more sizeable problem.

        • stoy@lemmy.zipEnglish
          1·
          5 days ago

          Ok but how would a lack of voter secrecy prevent the government from killing people who voted “wrong”?

          To me that just seems like it would make it easier.

          I am a Swede and have luckily never had to think about these things, if I am being arrogant with my staunch support of voter secrecy, I want to know.