KittiesAreCute!
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago

Spyware Found in AceMagic Mini-PCs

www.guru3d.com

external-link
message-square
54
link
fedilink
121
external-link

Spyware Found in AceMagic Mini-PCs

www.guru3d.com

MazonnaCara89@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago
message-square
54
link
fedilink
  • hue2hri19@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Unfortunetaly, that does close to nothing when the issue is spyware on firmware

    • Heratiki@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to this Tom’s Hardware article (https://www.tomshardware.com/desktops/mini-pcs/mini-pc-maker-ships-systems-with-factory-installed-spyware-acemagic-says-issue-was-contained-to-the-first-shipment) it isn’t firmware based spyware but just existing on the machine drive.

      They were also found on the restore partition so a full wipe and fresh install would eliminate the issue. AceMagic have also claimed that the issue was isolated to the first round of shipments.

      • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s reasonable to consider whether to trust a company that shipped spyware in the first place. I would have a hard time with that.

        • krolden@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Better stop using any modern cellphone ever then.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Trying to, but credible alternatives just don’t exist. I really want a Linux phone, but battery life and basic features just aren’t there.

        • Heratiki@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s more than likely they “borrowed” some other Chinese company’s cloned Windows drive and used it for their install rather than roll their own. Could be they were malicious but coming out and claiming it was an error so quickly doesn’t really push that narrative hard.

          • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We’re going to agree to disagree about that. Being caught red-handed would trigger an immediate mea culpa if they want to preserve plausible deniability and try again later.

          • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they weren’t the original malicious actor, then their quality control sucks. Either way, they shipped a booby-trapped system. Trusting them again will be hard for a lot of people.

      • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        How do you know? They find spyware not in firmware, but that doesn’t cover what they didn’t find.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure. I’m just saying that if a company is caught putting spyware into their products, I’m not going to trust them to suddenly fix it. If they cared, they should’ve caught this with internal QA.

            So either they’re negligent or malicious. If the former, they’ll probably be negligent again. If the latter, they’ll be more sneaky next time. Either way I don’t trust them.

            • helenslunch@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                My point is that we know there’s spyware on the image, so we should suspect malware elsewhere as well. Until the hardware is audited, we should assume that hardware is compromised as well.

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nothing in this article said anything about the device firmware being compromised

      • hue2hri19@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t say that

        • krolden@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunetaly, that does close to nothing when the issue is spyware on firmware

Technology@lemmy.ml

technology@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.ml

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 142 users / day
  • 747 users / week
  • 2.66K users / month
  • 7.32K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 39.1K subscribers
  • 3.45K Posts
  • 37.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org