There is nothing in the article about the game being dead, in fact it says it explicitly assumes that it will have respectable numbers once the dust settles.
It’s like you made up a reason why the article is wrong about something that it didnt even claim.
There is nothing in the article about the game being dead, in fact it says it explicitly assumes that it will have respectable numbers once the dust settles.
It’s like you made up a reason why the article is wrong about something that it didnt even claim.
You missed the ‘/s’ for sarcasm, didn’t you?
It’s absolutely 100% part of the reason why I interpreted it the way it was meant to be interpreted.
The best part of interpretation is how objective it is eh?
/s
I cant believe people are actually arguing that the top level poster wasn’t implying that this article is claiming that palworld failing.
i can’t believe it matters this much to you
I would rather something matter too much to me than be dishonest.
🙄
Weird to get self-righteous about your inability to understand clear sarcasm
Again, my response took the sarcasm into account. Its more likely that you don’t understand the sarcasm.
deleted by creator