• Dehydrated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    They probably sent the threats themselves to justify banning Proton Mail, because they want to destroy privacy and encryption.

  • Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hopefully that doesn’t go through. This could be grounds for blocking something else like tutanota. Hell, if it works in India other might follow.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In a statement, a Proton spokesperson told Indian daily Hindustan Times that the firm condemns the “potential block as a misguided measure that only serves to harm ordinary people.”

    It will not prevent cybercriminals from sending threats with another email service and will not be effective if the perpetrators are located outside of India.”

    Hindustan Times reported Thursday that the Indian IT Ministry had issued a notice to local internet service providers to block Proton Mail at the request of the Tamil Nadu police.

    D. Ashok Kumar, a senior cyber crime wing police officer in Tamil Nadu, told Moneycontrol on Friday that he had sent the request to the IT Ministry to block access to Proton Mail.

    Ashok Kumar, who is also the nodal officer for blocking orders in the state, said Proton Mail was “least responsive” in sharing details about the suspects who had sent the bomb threats.

    Many lawmakers and privacy advocacy groups expressed concerns over the possible block of Proton Mail in India.


    The original article contains 367 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m surprised that they didn’t use the “think on the children!” red herring yet. They probably will in the future, given that governments (not just India’s, but all of them) have a burning hate against anything privacy.

  • iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    Can we get away from email?

    It’s not a secure form of communication anyway. I want my messages to be e2e encrypted so I know I am the only one that can read them

            • naticus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yep, it just has you set a password, confirm it, and even set a hint if you want. Works on web or mobile.

                • naticus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Yes, there’s no other implementation I know of for provider-to-provider encrypted email. O365 is very similar. Recipients can then reply back too and the Proton user receives it directly.

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      What a stupid thing to say.

      Whatever your favorite (and probably shitty) proprietary or open source messaging service - not everybody uses it. But hey, everyone has email, so let’s kill that.

      BTW since you said encryption is important to you: your walled-garden messaging service has a much easier time profiling you and your friends than they would in a heterogenous environment like email. They don’t need the content anyway, just metadata.

        • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          No, they can’t since I don’t have a Google mail address. Even if I had, they’d have a harder time building a social graph when I communicate with others outside of Gmail.

      • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They don’t need the content anyway, just metadata.

        ProtonMail uses PGP encryption to encrypt emails, which means your meta data, including subject line is vulnerable to data collection. Also there is no forward secrecy with current PGP standard. See quotes from below:

        We have built Proton Mail with PGP fully integrated, … All messages between Proton Mail users are automatically end-to-end encrypted.

        https://proton.me/support/how-to-use-pgp

        Subject lines and recipient/sender email addresses are encrypted but not end-to-end encrypted.

        https://proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained

        PGP (especially for email) exposes much more info to outside party than any good communication protocol, like the signal protocol or OMEMO used by XMPP.

    • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s what s/mime does. If it were as easy to get personal certs as it is to get server certs through letsencrypt, everyone could easily sign and encrypt mail.

      I can certainly do it anyway, but you’d have to trust my self signed cert.

      That said, it’s pretty rare to find relays these days that are not using tls for transport, so there’s that.