“If Israel agrees to Hamas demands, which include the return of displaced Palestinians to northern Gaza and increasing humanitarian aid, that would pave the way for a (truce) agreement within the next 24 to 48 hours,” said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive issue, as negotiations were set to resume in Cairo.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Hamas has offered Israel multiple very tenable peace deals that include the immediate release of all Israeli prisoners and absolutely no demand for reparations for rebuilding the strip that is now thought to be uninhabitable for 70 years. Israel has denied every single one.

    They have always wanted palestinians to be exterminated. This is Israel’s dream scenario.

        • randoot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          Thank you for providing some sources. I haven’t read it all yet and most of the links don’t mention offers from Hamas. But I did see on Feb 20 Hamas offered to release some hostages in return for a temporary ceasefire and return of Hamas prisoners. This was rejected by Netanyahu.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      There were no such propositions and they have refused to give number of alive hostages since that was a condition for continued talks.

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve heard similar things in the opposite direction, that early when Israel was being split up, they offered Palestinians reasonable deals to have part of the land, including Jerusalem, that they refused because they wanted the whole thing, and therefore Israel got it all. No sources of course, just interesting that both sides say similar things.

      • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s a revisionist version of the peace process and what happened

        Partition has always been used as a way to take more Palestinian land, while Palestinians were repeatedly advocating for a Unitary / Binational State

      • WarlockLawyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        If someone entered my house and was trying to illegally force me out I also wouldn’t want to settle for only losing half my home.

            • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m not saying Britain rightfully owned the land beforehand, but they did own it, and both Jews and Muslims have historical claims to the land, neither more valid than the other.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Okay, if someone convicted me to fight the ones that took my home in exchange for getting my home back and then giving away half my home to someone that is slowly taking more and more of my home…

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        If i lived in a country where rich settlers were displacing my communities for decades, I too would reject “offers” to forever split my homeland in half based on the whims of guilty white supremacists on another continent.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The answer is right there. The Israelis drove them out and then required a deal to let people try to come home after the violence.

  • prole@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t think the Israeli government has any interest in a truce, and especially not one with those terms.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    To sum up right now. Israel’s pre condition is the release of all hostages. Which is also all of Hamas’ leverage. Hamas’ pre condition is to feed civilians. Terrorist stuff isn’t great but the white house and Israel are letting Hamas dunk on them in PR.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The thing throwing Israel off is that this isn’t new. The only difference is that the world is now paying (half hearted) attention. This was the goal of the attacks. Get the world to pay attention to what Israel has been doing.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s very interesting that the white house is practically admitting here that israel is using starvation as a weapon of war. And just casually includes it as “part of negotiations”.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    “If Israel agrees to Hamas demands…”

    Well we know that’s never going to happen.

        • BigilusDickilus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I honestly think that Bibi knows if he tanks Biden then Trump will probably be better for his government. He has basically no incentive to be reasonable since nobody is willing to hold them accountable and he knows it’s very unlikely Biden will be able to.

          • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Bibi wants genocide and the land. Trump hates Muslims and would gladly join in the bombing.

          • njm1314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I mean of course, trump is one of the ones that helped prop up Netanyahu during his declining popularity.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            We should have cut them loose ages ago.

            I saw one estimate that cumulative, since 1948, we’ve sent them $300 Billion.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I don’t care what Biden says. You don’t care what he says. Nobody cares what Biden says.

          Biden’s words mean nothing. Only his actions matter.

          So far Biden has done nothing but grovel for Netanyahu and try to give him as many bombs as possible. Biden has bypassed congress because israel needed those tank shells to commit Genocide with. Just a few days ago Biden once against used his UN veto’s for israel.

          Biden has all the power in the world to shut israel down. Netanyahu is powerless without Biden enabling his Genocide. Netanyahu is but a convenient scapegoat everyone points to blame.

          • kinther@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Biden biden biden. Never blame toward congress, ANY other figure, always Biden Biden Biden. It’s like you have an agenda

              • TheFriar@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                lol did you think congress was against it? Israel is the largest recipient of military aid since WW2. We’ve consistently given them aid, regardless of the president. You’re painting it as a move that went against congress’ wishes when it was to avoid the typical congressional delays.

                Your president doesn’t matter. It’s the country you live in. The US has never had a stance that’s opposed providing weapons and funding to Israel.

                The country is to blame. Not this particular president. The president changes, but there is a massive apparatus that supports Israel. I don’t even think a pro Palestinian president could realistically stop it. It’s way, way bigger than just the president. Even if you had a pro Palestinian president, congress would need to change entirely as well. You guys can’t help but look at just what’s in front of your faces. You’re missing the forest for the trees.

              • kinther@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Good call out. This shouldn’t be a thing that is possible since Congress supposedly controls our budget and spending.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Because Biden is in charge.

              Biden vetoes the ceasefires.

              Biden bypasses congress to help israel commit Genocide.

              Biden is the one who is responsible.

              If it was Trump in charge it would be Trump Trump Trump. Tell me is Trump president right now?

  • kinther@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    This would be great. The Palestinian people need real aid, right now. I hope Israel figures their shit out and pulls their troops out of Gaza.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have a feeling they won’t do that. They’ll call the demands unreasonable, say Hamas refused to negotiate in good faith, and keep killing indiscriminately.

    • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Israel (Zionism) has an explicit goal to ethnically cleanse the “lesser people” and establish a fascist state who has a holy duty and right to enslave all lesser people

      So yeah, this has been going on for 75 years directly because of Zionist ideology, it’s not going to stop now. History didn’t start on Oct 7th.

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    If the terms don’t include “kill all Palestinians” Israel isn’t going to accept them.

  • Astrealix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Both sides have said the same thing and offered peace deals that the other side is unwilling to accept, doesn’t really matter if neither side wants to negotiate. Sucks that the civilians just have to suffer while two assholes fight it out.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s only one side Genociding civilians right now and that’s israel. There is no “both sides”.

      Israel is a Nazi state.

      • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Hamas is terrible, Palestine is not. Hamas and Israel are in a symbiotic relationship to keep each other in power ruining the lives of all Palestinians. Hamas is in control because of work Israel did against the Palestinian Authority. That’s an important distinction you need to make. While also stating that Israel is an apartheid state committing genocide.

      • Opafi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well… I guess those Israelis that were butchered at that concert don’t count, then?

        Hamas is a terrorist organisation that has killed and kidnapped civilians. Israel killing more civilians doesn’t make Hamas any less of a despicable bunch of fucks.

        • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Here is a question I’d like to ask. When america still had slaves some slaves broke free and ended up killing some white people. What I find interesting is people don’t write them right away and bring into context what they had gone through. Extreme conditions produce extreme actions. And those extreme conditions were made by israel.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          We are well past that. Israel has far eclipsed Hamas’ crime. There’s only one population being killed and starved right now.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          These ones?

          Even including all the IDF kills Hamas has a 2:1 civilian casualty rate. The word Genocide is impossible to use there.

          And who is currently killing civilians right now. Is the date 7 october 2023?

          • Opafi@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            Are you really arguing that Hamas are the good guys because of their lower “civilian casualty rate”? Like, “yeah, they killed a lot of civilians, but the others killed more, so they’re the good guys, touché”? Are you insane?

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              10 months ago

              You’re presenting a false dichotomy.

              What Hamas did was a terrible, unforgivable act of terrorism. They should be punished for this - it doesn’t matter whether the victims were civilian or not.

              But Hamas isn’t murdering thousands of Israeli civilians right now - only Israel is murdering thousands of Palestinian civilians. Only one of these parties is currently engaged in genocide.

              This is just an explanation of what the other user was expressing. You are projecting terrible opinions onto them that they haven’t even come close to expressing.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Prior to 10/7, I’d agree. The voters in Gaza elected them to run the Palestinian government for a reason.

                After 10/7? You have to admit they fucked up, in a pretty colossal way. So huge that the only thing I can think of is that they wanted to provoke this insane reaction from Israel.

                Israel had been destroying lives in Gaza and the West Bank for DECADES now and the world at large hadn’t really been paying attention. Oh, we are now!

                So, yeah, Hamas ended up getting the reaction they wanted… at the cost of thousands of innocent Palestinian lives.

  • duffman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why dont the surrender? That’s what you do when you are utterly defeated and don’t want more people to die.

    • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      To die in resistance is better than to live as a slave. The israelis long term plan is to remove the Palestinians anyways by either “relocating” or killing Palestinians. Resistance has to come at some point otherwise its just a matter of time before they cease to exist or be in their land.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    Whats a ceasefire worth if Hamas keeps breaking ceasefires?

    The only thing a ceasefire is getting Hamas off scott free after killing thousands of Isarelis, and letting Hamas regroup and launch another Oct 7th.