smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down10
arrow-up119arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIt’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
minus-squarezarenki@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThe passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.
It’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.