dominiquec@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoNvidia is sued by authors over AI use of copyrighted workswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up1366arrow-down1external-linkNvidia is sued by authors over AI use of copyrighted workswww.reuters.comdominiquec@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square55fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·10 months agoI never said AI content should be banned.
minus-squareBreakDecks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·10 months agoThat was the entire context of your response. Did you read the comment you were replying to?
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·10 months agoCan I ask you a question? Are you stupid? Because you look stupid. I never said AI should be banned. You made that up.
minus-squareBreakDecks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·10 months agoYou really came back a day later and left a second angsty reply because I didn’t reply to your first one? lmao
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoYou didn’t reply to the first one because you had no answer. You’re still avoiding it. Sad.
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-210 months agoNo it wasn’t. You should reread my comment. Read. Then come back to me.
I never said AI content should be banned.
That was the entire context of your response. Did you read the comment you were replying to?
Can I ask you a question? Are you stupid? Because you look stupid. I never said AI should be banned. You made that up.
You really came back a day later and left a second angsty reply because I didn’t reply to your first one? lmao
You didn’t reply to the first one because you had no answer. You’re still avoiding it. Sad.
No it wasn’t. You should reread my comment.
Read. Then come back to me.