So I’ve had enough from partitioning my HDD between Linux and Windows, and I want to go full Linux, my laptop is low end and I tend to keep some development services alive when I work on stuff (like MariaDB’s) so I decided to split my HDD into three partitions, a distro (Arch) for my dev stuff, a distro (Pop OS) for gaming, and a huge shared home partition, what are the disadvantages of using a shared home (yes with a shared profile, I still want to access my Steam library from Arch if I want that)

Another thing that concerns me is GRUB, usually when I’m dualbooting with Windows, the Linux distro takes care of the grub stuff, should only a single distro take care of GRUB? or I need to install “the grub package” on both? Do both distros need separate boot partitions? Or a single one for a single distro (like a main distro) will suffice?

Another off topic question, my HDD is partitioned to oblivion, can I safely delete ALL partitions? Including the EFI one? I’m not on a MacBook, a typical 2014 Toshiba that’s my laptop

  • Sina@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t understand why would you want to use Arch for dev work and popos for gaming. Arch is not stable and will cause some issues every now and then and PopOS is worse for gaming, but is far more reliable on a production machine.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I use Mint on my gaming PC because I want minimum friction when it’s time to game. It should always just work, never boot up and need to roll back the kernel, Mesa version, etc.

      • Sina@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I get that, but if you want to play with new games, the latest mesa is what you want. sings BTRFS song for rollback

        For example even on ArchBTW I had to wait more than a month for a Mesa update to fix Alan Wake 2 for me.