• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That would require each subscribing instance to report its number of local subscribers to the instance hosting the community, which would then add up the numbers and report the total back to the subscribers. That seems like it would be easy to manipulate, where one malicious instance could misreport local subscriber numbers to change the apparent relative popularities of different communities throughout the fediverse.

      • Empyreus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean if that’s what we worry about then essentially everything could have that problem. What’s to stop an instance from artificially increasing their upvote counts so their posts are always at the top.

        • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure, but the amount of work involved scales differently. To inflate post or comment rankings by a thousand votes, you’d need to create a thousand separate fake upvotes per item, whereas for subscription totals you misreport one number and the effect is permanent. That would make malicious actors harder to detect.

    • TeaHands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s such an obviously weird stat to use, I’ve been assuming there must be some technical reason why it’s more complicated than we might think.