• JGrffn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This dude is trying to get people to think, to notice, to act, he’s trying to educate people and to help them change. Maybe don’t immediately disregard him as “not a true socialist”, maybe don’t outright jump to calling him a tankie. We’re all in this hell hole together, the least we could do is help each other out and spread the educational content, work together to give a friendly summary on our points of view, and keep moving forward.

    I like his content, and I like that he’s trying, that’s my opinion on him.

      • wtry@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The term originated when (iirc) Czechoslovakia was invaded by its fellow countries in the Warsaw Pact (it was also in the Warsaw Pact). Supporters of the invasion and supporters of a one-party Authoritarian State were henceforth called “Tankies”.

      • Communist Capi ☭ 🇵🇸 🏳️‍🌈@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Typically people that get called tankies defend the USSR, or China, or any other authoritarian socialist government by saying that shit was either completely made up by the west, or say that “the U.S. does it too and worse”, or anything else to avoid acknowledging the human rights abuses that have happened under the authoritarian socialist regimes.

        You can usually find them here in places like lemmygrad or hexbear. It’s a spectrum, some people side with Russia with the Ukraine invasion others think things like the uyghur genocide in Xinjiang is just capitalist propaganda.

        Here’s a good example of Second Thought doing it, constantly comparing things to what the U.S. does, which obviously are bad but just because the U.S. does it doesn’t mean that China can get away with it: https://youtu.be/NhPOrkGbpxk

        • wtry@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          One of the most obvious ones in this video is him comparing plain-clothes police to secret police. He also conveniently forgets both the definition of Authoritarianism:

          A form of government in which the governing body has absolute, or almost absolute, control. Typically this control is maintained by force, and little heed is paid to public opinion or the judicial system. Via Wiktionary

          and Nazis. Vaush has a good video debunking this one

  • wtry@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I personally don’t think he’s a real Socialist due to some things he’s done/has said, but I’d like to hear your opinions.

      • wtry@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        His support of Authoritarianism rubs me the wrong way, especially with his support of the USSR and CCP. I have more examples, but I’d have to scrounge them up.