mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoPlayboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journalsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square249fedilinkarrow-up1307arrow-down19
arrow-up1298arrow-down1external-linkPlayboy image from 1972 gets ban from IEEE computer journalsarstechnica.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square249fedilink
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up38arrow-down2·10 months agoThere’s also value in not basing your image compression algorithm on a low resolution scan of a magazine from the 1970s.
minus-squareBoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·10 months agoSeems like this is a much more important than any of the other discussions going on. How many results were tainted by the fact that they were compressing a dithered print image.
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·10 months agoConsidering it was defined as the benchmark, none.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·10 months agoYeah, there is, so do not do that and let others do that if they want. Everybody can use whichever pictures they like as far as I am concerned. FFS, it’s as if there could be only one way for everyone
There’s also value in not basing your image compression algorithm on a low resolution scan of a magazine from the 1970s.
Seems like this is a much more important than any of the other discussions going on. How many results were tainted by the fact that they were compressing a dithered print image.
Considering it was defined as the benchmark, none.
Yeah, there is, so do not do that and let others do that if they want.
Everybody can use whichever pictures they like as far as I am concerned.
FFS, it’s as if there could be only one way for everyone
Removed by mod