• MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is exactly my concern, I don’t want my online activity to become another revenue stream for meta. If they can put ads next to our posts then we’re back to working for free for the billionaires.

    • ch1cken@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok… but if a user chose to use meta’s application for threads, they’re likely fine with being tracked or seeing ads, whats wrong with that? Those that aren’t, can use alternative instances. You won’t see ads due to using kbin. So whats the issue?

      • MiscreantMouse@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue is the stuff I post being monetized by Zuck et al. I’m not interested in providing free content for billionaires.

      • fernandofig@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I understand correctly, the concern is not for the users on Meta’s “Threads”. It’s the fact that the content you create on Mastodon or whatever fediverse part with which Meta federated would eventually reach users on Threads, and thus “you” (on the fediverse corner outside of Meta) are indirectly monetized.