• AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    Guys, just buy laser printers, assuming you have any need for a printer still in the year of our lord, 2023. 15 years ago my printer wouldn’t let me scan a document because it was low on magenta ink, so I took it outside and smashed it on the ground, threw it into the dumpster, drove to the store, and bought a Brother laser printer. During the entire 15 years since then I’ve had to buy toner one time, and I found it at the thrift store for $5. That’ll probably hold us over for the rest of our lives since we rarely need to print these days. Ink jets are shitty rip-off machines. Destroy yours today.

    • Hypersapien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bought a Brother laser printer years ago and I’m still on the first full sized toner cartridge (not including the half sized one it came with).

      My printer usage got cut drastically when I stopped having in-person D&D games.

    • ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Photographers don’t have that option. Last time I checked, laser printers sucked for photos.

      I’m glad I don’t need to print photos. But if I did, I would probably consider one of these options:

      1. a continuous ink system (“CIS”). There are CIS kits for modifying a rip-off printer. There are also complete printers that come with an integrated CIS but they charge a fortune for those since they’re not gouging you on the ink swindles.

      2. project the digital image onto real photo paper in a darkroom & develop it with chemicals. I think Walmart has a machine that does that, in effect, and you pay per photo for their service.

      • RobotToaster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a photographer, I just bought a separate canon dye sub printer for 6x4s, I rarely print anything bigger so I just outsource it.

        Your 2nd option is called digital c-type, although the machines for that usually use lasers.

    • dlok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Amen I bought a used one from work for £20 8 years ago with a bunch of spare toners and I still haven’t used any of the toners. Do they actually go off?

        • SrElsewhere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or they may be good for one print, depending on how frequently the printer is used.

          Install a new cartridge, print one page, wait a year before trying to print again and you’ll need a new cartridge.

          It’s a no-brainer why they practically give those things away.

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re talking about an ink jet. I’m talking about a laser printer. The toner doesn’t dry out, it’s already dry. Our toner lasted us like 8 years before we had to replace it.

            • SrElsewhere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Indeed, I was. I’d lost the plot, thought the commenter above you had bought an inkjet. Thanks for the clarification.

    • danprs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got a brother laser free from work 5 years ago. Haven’t had to buy ink yet.

      We were implementing 802.11x auth at the domain, for all network nodes and had to can a few printers that didn’t support it. A few of us for lucky 😃

    • ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @Anticorp

      just buy laser printers

      If we didn’t have #climateChange, laser printers are favorable for most non-photographic use cases. But I hate to say it: laser printers are substantially less energy efficient than #inkjet printers.

      My solution: own no printer. Use a print shop or library. A lot of the energy waste is in powering on and charging up the drum. If you have to stand in line to use a #laserPrinter, that’s a good thing energy wise because high volumes is more efficient per page (but AFAIK still never as effecient as an inkjet… but perhaps reasonable enough).

      #climate #energy