• DarkThoughts@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I could see some people making the argument that it could be considered defamatory especially in cases where it is being peddled as real.

    Hard sell overall imo. But in any sort of malicious case we should punish the people behind it, not the software used to make it.

    • 8ender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s tough though. Do you punish “the artist” or the person who commissioned them? Or both?

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What? We’re talking about LLM created content, so there’s no artist or person commissioning anything. But if you’re asking for the hypothetical case of someone commissioning blackmail material at an artist (without telling them the purpose), then obviously the person who ends up doing the blackmail. I don’t see the how the artist would’ve made themselves liable unless it was very obvious that it was intended to be used for illegal purposes.

        • 8ender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          By artist I mean the LLM. Do you punish the LLM (or company running it) for generating it, or the person who asked it to?

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you’re asking me a question that is literally already answered within the comment you were replying to.