Vladimir Putin is not on the guest list, but Russian representatives have been invited to take part in WWII anniversary ceremony.

France’s decision to invite Russia to attend the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings has stoked tensions with allied nations as leaders prepare to gather on the Normandy beaches on June 6.

Last month, Paris caught Western countries off guard when D-Day organizers announced they were extending an invitation to Moscow even as Russia launches a fresh offensive on Ukraine. Officials from the United Kingdom and two other World War II allies expressed concerns over the move, raising questions ranging from the symbolic nature of the occasion, protocol issues and queries about diplomatic engagement with Russian representatives.

A U.K. government official said that France’s actions — not only the D-Day invitation but also hosting Chinese President Xi Jinping this month and sending a representative to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s inauguration — were “disturbing.”

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean

    Remembering old friendships and times we were suffering and struggling together, even if the present day is death and mistrust and we’re enemies, doesn’t seem like the worst thing in the world

    To a lot of people the US and the EU have often been the devil man that Russia is today. We can let it go for short periods of time, I think, sometimes.

    Just my opinion

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I can appreciate that sentiment but at the same time it’d be hard to swallow if I were Ukrainian and the Russians were at this very moment killing my countrymen while my ally invites them over for tea. It’s one thing to let go of the past, quite another to let go of the present.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, maybe so. I’m sorta just playing devil’s advocate. My point wasn’t that Russia isn’t a terrorist state which is visiting pointless destruction on the world at large in a stupid and dangerous way, more that the US has also roamed around the world killing innocent people for a variety of reasons, and we still get to go the Olympics and everything.

        (I mean I’m not saying they’re the same, and I kind of like that Russia got excluded from some of the friendly people’s clubs when they started behaving like a rabid dog. Just, I’m saying maybe extending an olive branch every now and then is okay.)

    • Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sanctioning Russia should take any and all forms until they stop their assault on Ukraine. They’ve made it clear that they’re not acting in good faith, so extending that to them is five steps short of appeasement.

        • thetreesaysbark@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          From what I’ve understand, sanctions have slowed Russia down significantly.

          They may still be able to get the things they need, but it’s costing them more than it would have to do so.

          This is a country that thought they could steamroll Ukraine in weeks and have now been stuck in the war for years.

          Feels to me like sanctions did a lot to help tbh.

        • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          We can keep them indefinitely then, right? If they’re not doing anything there is no need to ever revoke them.

        • Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Clearly not; I just meant that we should at the very least not be weakening the spirit of the sanctions even in the slightest by sending Russia diplomatic invitations to events.

        • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think you might mean “Sanctions alone will not do shit, Ukraine needs shells, planes, tanks and unfortunately more bodies.”

    • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      To a lot of people the US and the EU have often been the devil man that Russia is today

      Currently are. The average person of the average Arab country right now probably has a worse opinion of the US than they have of Russia, and for good reason. The post-colonial status of France in plenty of countries in West Africa also make a sizable amount of people there hostile to France, even if the situation is more nuanced. Personally, I’m not a fan of any empire.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah.

        Russia invades Ukraine and bombs apartment buildings, it’s like hey WTF those are perfectly innocent people

        Israel turns the whole of Gaza into a wasteland of corpses and famine and it’s like well of course, they’re seeing to their security situation, as any country would, here’s some bombs my loving brother

        I don’t think Israel should be allowed at the Olympics either, FWIW

    • absquatulate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Western countries’ relationship with russia may be more relaxed and allow for making ammends, but for any country in the east there was never a time in the past centuries when russia has not behaved lile a bully. Heck, ask any ww2 survivor in eastern europe and they’ll tell you the russian “liberator” soldier was just a pillaging and raping piece of shit, and this was when they were technically not the occupier. And this before you start discussing the horrors of russian communist imperialism. I think its quite justified to think they should not be invited to any ww2 commemorations or allowed to act like they are part of “the good guys”.

      • Miaou@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why do any ww2 commemoration if you’re not going to invite the country that ended the war at this point ?

    • 0xb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      True, but it’s not the first time someone has that idea. Germany spent 2 decades appeasing Russia to try to integrate them, and america and NATO basically served their requests after the 2008 invasion of Georgia in an attempt to get them to behave and be a part of the gang. We already know that it means nothing to Putin, we don’t need to try this stuff again.

  • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I am not sure if Macron is trying to play some 5D underwater chess, after talking about sending troops some weeks back, or if he is just a headless chicken running around.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Going headless chicken has always been France’s international diplomatic strategy.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Here’s a better idea. Take all living world War vets give them an all expense paid trip there and have the politicians stay home.

    • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why limit that to just the WW2 vets? Remembrance days are often for all veterans. Often they sacrifice the best years of their lives. Even the logistics and Facilities personnel often have knee, back, and other maladies related to their service.

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s called d-day commemoration.

        But sure why not. Ww2 vets get all expenses paid to get there and the rest are welcome to go but they pay for it by themselves.

        • aodhsishaj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I was referring to other remembeance days like in Canada where it’s a memorial day for all veterans

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    PARIS — France’s decision to invite Russia to attend the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings has stoked tensions with allied nations as leaders prepare to gather on the Normandy beaches on June 6.

    Last month, Paris caught Western countries off guard when D-Day organizers announced they were extending an invitation to Moscow even as Russia launches a fresh offensive on Ukraine.

    Officials from the United Kingdom and two other World War II allies expressed concerns over the move, raising questions ranging from the symbolic nature of the occasion, protocol issues and queries about diplomatic engagement with Russian representatives.

    The organizer of the D-Day commemorations, Mission Libération, which is headed by France’s former ambassador to Washington Philippe Etienne, said last month that Russian representatives would be invited though Putin was persona non grata at the ceremony.

    Tobias Ellwood, a Conservative MP and former U.K. defense minister, defended the move and said if Russia were not invited, then “we would risk blurring the geopolitics of today with the unity of purpose in defeating Nazism in the past.” The Soviet Union lost an estimated 27 million people during World War II.

    Last week, France’s ambassador to Russia Pierre Lévy raised eyebrows when he attended Putin’s fifth presidential inauguration amid a boycott by most Western countries.


    The original article contains 704 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 70%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!