Yeah, not a conflict. And so long ago that the current political situation is totally different.
The US wouldn’t have a choice, if Israel attacks a NATO country then it’s article 5 automatically. Then their only option would be to leave NATO and they’re not going to do that.
Okay man. Note that nowhere in the comment chain before you decided to chime in did anyone say conflict. And as far as I know, an attack is an attack and it usually warrants retaliation. But Israel gets unlimited oopsies, lord forbid that Egypt or Lebanon does this, it’s immediately casus belli if the current governments aren’t friendly.
well israel has attacked a nato country before to no consequence. The United States.
deleted by creator
Point stands - Israel attacking a NATO nation wouldn’t cause american support to waver. Israel serves our colonial interests too much for that.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
So just being a pedant then.
deleted by creator
What do you mean Israel in the United States have never had a conflict between them
Referencing this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident?wprov=sfti1
Yeah, not a conflict. And so long ago that the current political situation is totally different.
The US wouldn’t have a choice, if Israel attacks a NATO country then it’s article 5 automatically. Then their only option would be to leave NATO and they’re not going to do that.
You are not arguing in good faith.
Okay man. Note that nowhere in the comment chain before you decided to chime in did anyone say conflict. And as far as I know, an attack is an attack and it usually warrants retaliation. But Israel gets unlimited oopsies, lord forbid that Egypt or Lebanon does this, it’s immediately casus belli if the current governments aren’t friendly.