• Rayspekt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The only thing that sounds wild in the article is that the manufacturer supposedly didn’t test the antennae’s unfolding mechanism on the ground. Did they think they could just send a technician if something won’t work lmao

    • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Systems like that can easily be difficult or impossible to test on the ground, because they aren’t strong enough to work under gravity. They might need to be in free-fall to survive being deployed

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        TBF the cost justification of added machinery weight to operate under many conditions is still better than needing to restart completely when it failed.