• rwhitisissle@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well my initial goal was pointing out how stupid OP’s post was but now that you’ve decided to engage with me I’d say it’s because of your positively magnetic personality and my near pathological need to bicker with people on the internet.

      • then_three_more@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        How is the post stupid? Yeah, you correctly identified that it’s a corporate logo/art work. It’s still interesting and clever the design that’s gone into it.

        • rwhitisissle@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well, for one, its relationship to “Gaming” is tenuous, at best. Two, it’s wholly superficial. There’s nothing even remotely conversation worthy here. “Look at this neat design.” Okay, and? What is the expected or desired response to that?

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            The logo design for a gaming consoles

            relationship to “Gaming” is tenuous, at best.

            I’m actually curious. In what world do you think a major game console has a tenuous relationship to gaming?

            • rwhitisissle@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              You mean the console or the shape of its logo? Because those are different things. This is a discussion purely centered around graphic design for a gaming system’s logo. The graphic could be literally anything else and it wouldn’t change the console or its games. It’s like having a community dedicated to books and discussing those books and someone posting a picture of bookends, saying “look at these cool book bookends.” If someone said “that doesn’t have much to do with books” they would be (generally) right. It’s probably off topic for the intended subject matter of the community, in addition to being not very interesting. You might think that the logos for consoles is perfectly valid as a topic of discussion. In which case, great. Happy for you. I don’t agree and I elected to state that opinion.

          • then_three_more@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well, for one, its relationship to “Gaming” is tenuous, at best

            I agree it would potentially be better in a mildly interesting or a graphics design based community. But it is related to gaming, even if tenuously.

            There’s nothing even remotely conversation worthy here. “Look at this neat design.” Okay, and? What is the expected or desired response to that?

            And yet multiple people have managed to make responses. Discussing the design in relation to other Nintendo designs etc.

            Just because you couldn’t think of something to add to the conversation doesn’t mean others couldn’t.

            • rwhitisissle@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              And yet multiple people have managed to make responses.

              Yes, and their responses are either equally vapid or are things like “Wait until they hear about the FedEx logo.” My initial response was critical of the underlying nature of the post, and I would argue that this conversation we are having right now, is substantially better than any conversation being had about the logo itself. So I guess I did have something to add to the conversation, otherwise (wait for it) you wouldn’t have bothered responding to me. Would you?