• funkajunk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      At first I naively thought “why is that a bad thing?”, but then realized who exactly decides what these “national interests” are?

      Definitely using some “weasel words” in their policy to get away with some shady shit.

      • pacmondo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Any law that you see that you think “Wow, no way they can enforce that! That would get EVERYBODY in trouble” is a law that is intended to be selectively enforced against unwanted people

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      That could be how you would mean it, but that is not how I interpret it or how they intended it.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          You guys literally just claim things without any evidence… You guys have lost to plot

      • TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        If something is against “national interest” and your president is trying to become an autocrat, that means they can essentially pick and choose what national interest is. This should be setting off alarm bells in EVERYONE’S head as an obvious grab for power.

        I’m not american, so I don’t have direct skin in the game, but everyone on both sides of the political spectrum who don’t self identify as fascist should be against this.

        If you don’t interpret this as something extremely dangerous, you need to have a sit down and really think about the implications.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So the issue is that this is not what they are referring to. What they are talking about is when the FBI (and CIA) get involved in politics or directly sway things in direction that is outside of what the FBI is for.