• eee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s stupid.

    The main problem with lemmy now is adoption, there isn’t a critical mass of users yet.

    When users see the stats without lemmy.world, they’ll be discouraged from joining. Add to that the issues with federation and the few who join will leave because of the steep learning curve.

    Way to alienate potential users.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      As far as I’m concerned that’s a feature. If we let the normies in then it just turns into Reddit all over again. That slop pile can stay over there.

      • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s still room to grow. We could still double the number of active people to 100k and have a wide margin compared to having millions of users

      • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They are okay as devs, not that good as admins, which is fine, it is known by now, and people can move easily.

        To the people who are going to answer that they are bad devs too, which other devs are that much better than them at this moment for link aggregators in the Fediverse?

        I like Piefed and Mbin as much as the next guy, but Lemmy is still the most polished software as of now. Maybe that will change in the future, but let’s face it: with the amount of pushback the Lemmy devs are getting regularly, the fact that most of the instances still use Lemmy is a sign that there the alternatives aren’t that much better.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The devs are working hard providing a public service that they make available for everyone. And the product they’ve developed is pretty impressive, in spite of its shortcomings.

        They hold some opinions I disagree with pretty strongly, and I’m not a fan of every decision they make. But they’re creating a truly common good, and for that they deserve praise. From a technical perspective, they have created something completely new that serves thousands of users and constitutes a system of huge complexity. They very much do not suck.

        Anyone who thinks any person maintaining an open source project “sucks” should feel free to fork the project, fix whatever they’re not happy with, and maintain the repository and handle commits and all the shit that goes down in managing a large open source project. After dedicating all this time to people, some random ingrate will inevitably disagree with some minor decision they’ve made and decide that they “suck”.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I mean. They’re torpedoing that open source project’s chances for growth because of their ideology. It’s pretty sucky.

          I agree with the rest of your statement regarding the development of Lemmy.

          • cabbage@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, for sure. Doing something great doesn’t shield you from also making some really shitty decisions or holding some god-awful positions.

            I just think it’s good to keep a nuance of language. Too many open source developers burn out, and a hostile community is listed as one of the reasons too often. There will always be disagreements, and there are valid ways of voicing it, but one should never forget that there is humans on the other side and remain kind. :)

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah. If they pushed it to the bottom of the list, or even removed them from the list but kept the user count, I could kind of understand it. But censoring them completely for being too successful seems like shooting yourself in the foot.

      Lemmy.world is doing great and I’m happy for it and all that, but… 20 000 monthly active users does not exactly make them a tech giant that needs to be kept in check just yet. Ideally, instances of 20 000 active users should be quite normal at some point, and having stress tested the software before then should, one assumes, be a good thing.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        But censoring them completely for being too successful seems like shooting yourself in the foot.

        It honestly has me considering leaving the Fediverse. If this place is so anti- normie, fuck em

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Most people are fine. All social media has some bad eggs - admittedly FOSS/GNU/Linux communities are prone to attract a specific breed of them. But they can generally be ignored pretty easily.

            • cabbage@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Not of Lemmy.world, where you are writing from. And I’m not even writing you from Lemmy. :)

              The developers of the platform are not in control over what it’s used for. Which is what’s neat about these place.

    • asudox@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      the few who join will leave because of the steep learning curve.

      what steep learning curve? what’s so steep about thinking of social media like email?

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh come on, let’s not pretend that the fediverse is just super intuitive and easy for regular users (i.e. non-techie people). Same ridiculous notion as when people say Linux is just as user-friendly as the more mainstream OSes. It’s sad and I wish it was better but it’s just not right now.

        • asudox@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It might be a little more complicated than normal social media and email but it definitely is not that complex.

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Sorry, but the fact that you’re here means that you are probably in the top percentages of tech-literate people. Especially considering you’re on programming.dev.

            You’re severely overestimating the technical literacy of regular people. For many people (maybe even the majority of people) even email is complex.

          • T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That “little more complicated” is asking for a lot, though.

            Say you’re coming from Reddit, or Facebook, or something.

            It would not be unreasonable to believe that, like Reddit, every single Lemmy instance is its own separate, self-contained site.

            And that’s even before figuring out federation works, and how to access things from outside of your instance, or all the nuances that come with defederation and all of that. You made the mistake of joining beehaw? Whoops, all the other “subs” are now inaccessible, because beehaw is not connected to any of the others.

            Central places like Reddit don’t have that complexity. Reddit communities are singular, and there’s no overarching layer to complicate things. A community that disagrees with another, and blocks them doesn’t affect your experience as an user.