• Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    24 days ago

    The same year, the UK government resisted pressure to regulate loot boxes, saying the video game industry could self-regulate instead.

    Oh yeah, how well is that going?

    Self-regulation is a lie, you need an objective referee to ensure everyone is playing by the rules. Having a referee that can’t punish anyone is as good as not having one at all

    • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      24 days ago

      “Oh yessum I’ll absolutely deliberately lower my profits for the safety of my customer, you bet!” People who think business has any other motivating incentive than profit are the dumbest kind of bootlicker and it makes me so sad.

      It’s not even a referee, it’s three shareholders in a zebra print trench coat.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Self-regulation can work for safety but only if the measures needed to make things safer are cheap and pretty much don’t require quality control (e.g. do not install a slippery type of floor in front of your butcher counter) and the consequences are severe even without regulation (bad press, significantly fewer customers, medical bills to pay for the customer who does slip,…).

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      Self-regulation can work in cases where the incentives are set up just right, but when it works you have no real need to bring up regulation at all so whenever regulation is worth considering at all self-regulation has already failed pretty much by definition.